Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Using protobuf CommitRequest in datastore Connection.commit. - #1341
Conversation
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
tseaver
commented
Jan 7, 2016
It makes me queasy to think about reusing a batch or a transaction. If somebody wanted to examine the |
This is towards googleapis#1288 in preparation for the upgrade to `v1beta3`. In particular, a single `Mutation` protobuf instance in `v1beta3` is not sufficient to contain all changes to be committed, so we use the container that is up one level in the hierarchy.
a1194f5 to
7f1b786Comparedhermes
commented
Jan 7, 2016
OK. Should I file an issue to move the tombstone behavior into PS I just rebased, had a merge issue. |
tseaver
commented
Jan 7, 2016
I think we could just open an issue and go on. |
dhermes
commented
Jan 7, 2016
LGTY to merge? |
dhermes
commented
Jan 7, 2016
Filed #1366 |
tseaver
commented
Jan 7, 2016
LGTM |
Using protobuf CommitRequest in datastore Connection.commit.
This is towards #1288 in preparation for the upgrade to
v1beta3. In particular, a singleMutationprotobuf instance inv1beta3is not sufficient to contain all changes to be committed, so we use the container that is up one level in the hierarchy.