Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Switching from nosetests to py.test. - #2241
Conversation
dhermes
commented
Sep 2, 2016
I also created https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-python/tree/use-pytest to spawn https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dhermes/gcloud-python/build/1.0.617.use-pytest Will delete after this is verified. |
| @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ | |||
| [nosetests] | |||
| exclude-dir = system_tests | |||
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
26626a2 to
19df78bCompare| commands = | ||
| {[testing]covercmd} --cover-min-percentage=100 | ||
| {[testing]covercmd} | ||
| coverage report --show-missing --fail-under=100 |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In the process, fixing some PATH issues in "gcloud._helpers" (path separator was explicitly provided, rather than using "os.join"). Also the the associated tests were refactored with more mocks so that they depend less on the OS.
dhermes
commented
Sep 2, 2016
The That job didn't fail, I just canceled it, since it would be repetetive to run both PUSH/PR for the same exact code. This should be ready to merge if I can get an LGTM. |
theacodes
commented
Sep 3, 2016
Lgtm On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, 4:49 PM Danny Hermes notifications@github.com wrote:
|
No description provided.