Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Remove invalid chunk validation - #2992
Conversation
lukesneeringer
commented
Feb 9, 2017
@dhermes Can you glance at this one? I lack sufficient context. |
dhermes
commented
Feb 9, 2017
| assert self.state == self.ROW_IN_PROGRESS | ||
| self._validate_chunk_status(chunk) | ||
| if not chunk.HasField('commit_row') and not chunk.reset_row: | ||
| _raise_if(not chunk.timestamp_micros or not chunk.value) |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lukesneeringer
commented
Feb 9, 2017
@dhermes Update on the |
dhermes
commented
Feb 9, 2017
I restarted the CircleCI build: https://circleci.com/gh/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-python/865 Hopefully it works? |
garye
commented
Feb 13, 2017
Can someone help me finish this off? The test failures don't really seem related. Getting this fix pushed and released will unblock a number of users. |
dhermes
commented
Feb 13, 2017
@garye Just re-started the CircleCI build: https://circleci.com/gh/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-python/876 Hopefully the bad imports are fully resolved. I'll follow-up if not. |
dhermes
commented
Feb 13, 2017
@garye So we've got a unit test failing that is actually caused by this PR: ISTM the right move is just to delete this test case since it no longer applies? |
garye
commented
Feb 13, 2017
yeah, i think that's an invalid test case |
dhermes
commented
Feb 13, 2017
Ping me when this PR is updated with the test case removed? You can ignore the speech test failures. It looks like the underlying protobuf libraries are (now correctly) using single instead of double precision for message fields with single precision |
garye
commented
Feb 13, 2017
via email
Will do, thanks …On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, 1:25 PM Danny Hermes ***@***.***> wrote:
Ping me when this PR is updated with the test case removed? You can ignore
the speech test failures. It looks like the underlying protobuf libraries
are (now correctly) using single instead of double precision for message
fields with single precision
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2992 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACTr3aTAOjGxQ5hgBk6h-nz-2JJq70Pks5rcKAcgaJpZM4L8Ql5>
.
|
| with self.assertRaises(InvalidChunk): | ||
| prd.consume_next() | ||
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
garye
commented
Feb 13, 2017
Yeah, thanks I noticed that and (hopefully) pushed a fix. |
tseaver
commented
Feb 13, 2017
@garye Ugh, you need to be able to run bigtable/unit_tests/test_row_data.py:419:1: W293blanklinecontainswhitespace |
garye
commented
Feb 13, 2017
via email
Ugh, OK. That will take a bit of time to set up. …On Mon, Feb 13, 2017, 4:11 PM Tres Seaver ***@***.***> wrote:
@garye <https://github.com/garye> Ugh, you need to be able to run tox -e
lint locally:
bigtable/unit_tests/test_row_data.py:419:1: W293 blank line contains whitespace
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2992 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACTr05fXHOLT3PHG9DwvC9OaiCJnV7Gks5rcMbkgaJpZM4L8Ql5>
.
|
tseaver
commented
Feb 13, 2017
I think it should just work to run $ export GOOGLE_CLOUD_TESTING_REMOTE=upstream # the name of the remote for this repo
$ export GOOGLE_CLOUD_TESTING_BRANCH=master
$ tox -e lint |
dhermes
commented
Feb 14, 2017
LGTM |
garye
commented
Feb 15, 2017
Thanks guys! |
dhermes
commented
Feb 15, 2017
@garye We hope to cut a release in the next 2-3 days as well |
Remove invalid chunk validation
Remove invalid chunk validation
Fixes#2980