Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Revert "RPC retries (second PR) (#3324)" - #3642
Conversation
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
@jonparrott It's probably easier if we make a branch with the "broken" code already in, and then @calpeyser or someone else can send a PR to fix that branch? |
theacodes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
@jonparrott I'm OK with just the current Why get fancy? |
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
CircleCI is green, let's merge this puppy? |
theacodes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
cherry-picking places the changes on top of the current master instead of being based on the past (which will be important when we merge the operation future stuff) |
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
OK, on it. |
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
Done. After I cherry-picked I |
theacodes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
Don't do it until #3623 is merged |
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
I shall garden away on the |
dhermes
commented
Jul 20, 2017
Rebase went smoothly 👍 |
dhermes
commented
Jul 26, 2017
@calpeyser@garye@mbrukman FYI #3324 has been reverted and the contents (which need fixing, e.g. because they broken the Bigtable system tests) are in the |
mbrukman
commented
Jul 26, 2017
Thanks for the heads up, @dhermes! For our future reference, how does one run all the tests that Circle CI will run after submit? Is it just running |
tseaver
commented
Jul 26, 2017
@mbrukman one needs to run $ . /path/to/configure_my_credentials.sh
$ cd /path/to/google-cloud-python/bigtable
$ nox |
theacodes
commented
Jul 26, 2017
FYI: we're working on a more comprehensive retry story for this library. |
mbrukman
commented
Jul 28, 2017
@dhermes — were you planning to address the build issues in the @jonparrott — will that work on a more comprehensive retry story remove the need for this change for Bigtable, or should we still re-submit this change anyway, and that will be a more generic change that we might incorporate into the Bigtable library at some point in the future? |
dhermes
commented
Jul 28, 2017
Sorry for miscommunicating here. I unfortunately do not have cycles for this. |
theacodes
commented
Jul 28, 2017
My hope is that the work will provide the foundation for adding retries to all libraries, at which point we can revisit this change. I'd love to work with you to validate the new functionality and get it into BigTable. |
garye
commented
Jul 28, 2017
@jonparrott That's an exciting development. Please keep us looped in! |
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This reverts commit 67f4ba4.
This is due to system test failures
We're happy to reconsider the PR that we reverted, but it must not break the build.