Skip to content

Updating README to meet unified gcloud-* format. - #673

Merged
dhermes merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
dhermes:standardize-readme
Feb 24, 2015
Merged

Updating README to meet unified gcloud-* format.#673
dhermes merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
dhermes:standardize-readme

Conversation

@dhermes

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jgeewax PTAL

Holding off on Authorization until we finalize this behavior and unify across services.

Styled after https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-node

See https://github.com/dhermes/gcloud-python/blob/standardize-readme/README.rst for updated version.

Partially addresses #591.

Needs #668 to be done among other things before Authorization can be documented (not a very unified approach right now)

Holding off on Authorization until we finalize this behavior
and unify across services.
@googlebotgooglebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Feb 20, 2015
@coveralls

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 1b0c45f on dhermes:standardize-readme into 56f60bb on GoogleCloudPlatform:master.

@jgeewax

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍

dhermes added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2015
Updating README to meet unified gcloud-* format.
@dhermes
dhermes merged commit 129995c into googleapis:masterFeb 24, 2015
@dhermes
dhermes deleted the standardize-readme branch February 24, 2015 18:05
@dhermesdhermes mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2015
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2025
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
* feat: Support the Count aggregation query
* Fix docs build
* Add test coverage for calling count from Query.
* Fix the test.
* Add aggregation doc and update docstrings.
* Add the aggregation.rst file
* Test that the aggregation alias is unique
Test in transaction
* 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md
* Type annotation fix
* Remove unneeded variable
Refactor system test suite to fallback to default creds
Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2026
* chore: use gapic-generator-python 0.65.2
PiperOrigin-RevId: 444333013
Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@f91b6cf
Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@16eb360
Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiMTZlYjM2MDk1YzI5NGU3MTJjNzRhMWJmMjM1NTA4MTdiNDIxNzRlNSJ9
* 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor
See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md
Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
…pes (#673)
* parse parameterized schema info
* Fixed SchemaField repr/key
* Fix code duplication between _parse_schema_resource and from_api_repr
Move new parameterized-type code from _parse_schema_resource to from_api_repr
and implement _parse_schema_resource in terms of from_api_repr.
* empty schemas are lists now, just like non-empty schemas.
* changed new parameterized-type tests to use from_api_repr
Because that's more direct and it uncovered duplicate code.
* paramaterized the from_api_repr tests and added to_api_repr tests
* Test BYTES and _key (repr) too.
* Added a round-trip parameterized types schema tests
* handle BYTES in _key/repr
* blacken
* Move _get_int close to use
* Updated documentation.
* Oops, forgot BIGNUMERIC
* Improve argument doc and better argument name to __get_int
* doom tables before creating them.
* Use max_length in the Python for the REST api maxLength
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yesThis human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@dhermes@coveralls@jgeewax@googlebot