Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit. - #722
Merged
Merged
Conversation
coveralls
commented
Mar 12, 2015
dhermesforce-pushed
the
storage-batch-use-implicit
branch
from
March 13, 2015 16:29
2b53706 to
00e6966Comparetseaver
commented
Mar 13, 2015
Contributor
LGTM |
coveralls
commented
Mar 13, 2015
Also removing last explicit use of the implicit connection in storage regression test.
dhermesforce-pushed
the
storage-batch-use-implicit
branch
from
March 13, 2015 17:00
00e6966 to
8007c17Comparedhermes added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2015
STORAGE: Allowing Batch() constructor to fall back to implicit.
coveralls
commented
Mar 13, 2015
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 21, 2023
- [ ] Regenerate this pull request now. PiperOrigin-RevId: 456827138 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@23f1a15 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@4075a85 Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNDA3NWE4NTE0ZjY3NjY5MWVjMTU2Njg4YTViYmYxODNhYTk4OTNjZSJ9 feat: Update Compute Engine API to revision 20220526 (#722) Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis@950dd73 Source-Link: googleapis/googleapis-gen@57ace17 Copy-Tag: eyJwIjoiLmdpdGh1Yi8uT3dsQm90LnlhbWwiLCJoIjoiNTdhY2UxNzhjODU0M2M0NDYyNzgyMzA0NTkxNzgyMGQ2N2I0OTBjMSJ9 fix(deps): require google-api-core 2.8.0
parthea added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2025
parthea added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
…n available (#722) * feat: use faster query_and_wait method from google-cloud-bigquery when available fix unit tests fix python 3.7 fix python 3.7 fix python 3.7 fix python 3.7 fix wait_timeout units boost test coverage remove dead code boost a little more coverage * restore missing test
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
- Batch mutations in a thread to allow concurrent batching - Flush the batch every second - Add flow control to control inflight requests Co-authored-by: Mattie Fu <mattiefu@google.com>
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
chore: relocate owl bot post processor
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2025
* ci: create sponge_log.xml files * test: fix noxfile Co-authored-by: arithmetic1728 <58957152+arithmetic1728@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
Automated: Migrate {target_path} from gsutil to gcloud storage
This CL is part of the on going effort to migrate from the legacy
`gsutil` tool to the new and improved `gcloud storage` command-line
interface.
`gcloud storage` is the recommended and modern tool for interacting with
Google Cloud Storage, offering better performance, unified
authentication, and a more consistent command structure with other
`gcloud` components. 🚀
### Automation Details
This change was **generated automatically** by an agent that targets
users of `gsutil`.
The transformations applied are based on the [gsutil to gcloud storage
migration guide](http://go/gsutil-gcloud-storage-migration-guide).
### ⚠️ Action Required: Please Review and Test Carefully
While we have based the automation on the migration guide, every use
case is unique.
**It is crucial that you thoroughly test these changes in environments
appropriate to your use-case before merging.**
Be aware of potential differences between `gsutil` and `gcloud storage`
that could impact your workflows.
For instance, the structure of command output may have changed,
requiring updates to any scripts that parse it. Similarly, command
behavior can differ subtly; the `gcloud storage rsync` command has a
different file deletion logic than `gsutil rsync`, which could lead to
unintended file deletions.
Our migration guides can help guide you through a list of mappings and
some notable differences between the two tools.
Standard presubmit tests are run as part of this CL's workflow. **If you
need to target an additional test workflow or require assistance with
testing, please let us know.**
Please verify that all your Cloud Storage operations continue to work as
expected to avoid any potential disruptions in production.
### Support and Collaboration
The `GCS CLI` team is here to help! If you encounter any issues, have a
complex use case that this automated change doesn't cover, or face any
other blockers, please don't hesitate to reach out.
We are happy to work with you to test and adjust these changes as
needed.
**Contact:** `gcs-cli-hyd@google.com`
We appreciate your partnership in this important migration effort!
#gsutil-migrationparthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2026
* chore: Remove notes about ordering keys being experimental. * Revert "chore: Remove notes about ordering keys being experimental." This reverts commit 38b2a3e91dd4f3f3c6657f4660fa1df8c0239124. * feat: Add support for server-side flow control * Add unit test for flow control * samples: create BigQuery subscription * samples: update BigQuery subscription test * Fix linter error for PR 722 * samples: create BigQuery subscription fix unused variable Co-authored-by: Anna Cocuzzo <63511057+acocuzzo@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2026
* docs: lint fix for samples * refactor: change 'from' to upper case for a SQL command
parthea pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
* chore(deps): update dependency google-cloud-spanner to v3.56.0 * chore: update tests for mux session usage --------- Co-authored-by: Knut Olav Løite <koloite@gmail.com>
parthea added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
NOTE: Has #721 as diffbase.Also removing last explicit use of the implicit connection in storage regression test.