Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 23, 2026. It is now read-only.
fix: save empty IAM policy bindings - #155
Merged
Merged
Conversation
busunkim96
commented
Mar 22, 2021
Comment on lines
+35
to
+36
| assert len(policy) == 0 | ||
| assert dict(policy) == {} |
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Accessing policy.owners, policy.editors results in __getitem__ being called, which adds empty entries to the dictionary. I moved these empty dict asserts up as a result.
An alternative is to keep them in their previous location and check that the three roles with empty bindings were added
parthea
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2021
This was referenced May 30, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes#154
__getitem__currently returns an emptyset()for items not in the bindings. If someone adds to the set returned by__getitem__the changes will not be reflected on the actual policy object.