Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 6, 2026. It is now read-only.
test: remove pragma - #2212
Merged
Merged
Conversation
leahecole
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Three more fixes for Issue: 2132. This will close out that Issue.
Removes a
# pragma: no coverstatement. There was a test that covered the condition in question but for some reason, during the process of removing Python3.7and3.8runtime dependencies,coveragewas not detecting it.coveragenow correctly identifies the existing test as providing unit test coverage.Added conditionals to handle differences between how
pandas 1.3andpandas 2.0+handle timestamps (usvsns).Fixes#2132 🦕