Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: look for transaction info on child job, not parent job - #978
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So that was it? We might want to document that in the property's docstring?
Edit: And maybe also here in the product docs (it's not obvious that a parent job is not part of the multi-statement transaction, at least not to me 🙃 ).
tswast
commented
Sep 21, 2021
That's the theory. According to a backend engineer "Script parent job is not part of the transaction started in the script. And a script can create multiple transactions, e.g., many Good idea, re: docstring. Added! |
plamut
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the quick docstring update!
One nit, but not essential.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
tswast
commented
Sep 21, 2021
Sent internal CL 397996384 for review to update the REST API docs. |
…pis#978) * test: look for transaction info on child job, not parent job * clarify transaction_info docstring * use sphinx method directive
Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:
Fixes#975 🦕