Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 13, 2026. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trying to think of cases where this could alter requests we're not anticipating and may have issue with the prettyprint param.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could make a pre-release and verify that the tests for other libs that depend on
google-cloud-corestill pass. (The pre-release can also be given to the customer to pin explicitly).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since google-resumable-media uses "requests" directly, this shouldn't affect it.
I've tested these changes locally with the BigQuery system & sample tests, which all pass and do several load jobs.
I'm trying to test locally with the Storage system tests, but seem to be missing some setup steps around their encryption-related tests.
No, since google-auth uses "requests" directly. It doesn't go through this library. Even if it did, I believe they've actually moved to a One Platform API for fetching tokens now. (Guessing based on the new-ish oauth2.googleapis.com endpoint)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created a pre-release at #31