Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
fix: Fixed object paths in autogenerated code in owlbot.py#804
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
2ea5991c2014824700f8a0dddf60File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ | ||
| async def sample_copy_log_entries(): | ||
| # Create a client | ||
| client = logging_v2.ConfigServiceV2AsyncClient() | ||
| client = logging_v2.services.config_service_v2.ConfigServiceV2AsyncClient() | ||
| # Initialize request argument(s) | ||
| request = logging_v2.CopyLogEntriesRequest( | ||
| request = logging_v2.types.CopyLogEntriesRequest( | ||
Contributor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. One thought: these generated samples aren't covered by tests. Have you considered adding tests for these to catch this kind of issue in the future, like the other snippets? Smoke tests could be helpful here (i.e. just executing each function and making sure nothing crashes) There may be a simple way to programmatically load and execute each sample, but if it's bit more complicated we could open a bug for later | ||
| name="name_value", | ||
| destination="destination_value", | ||
| ) | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we discussed the possibility of eventually restructuring the gapic/veneer files into different folders, which should remove the need for this fix, right?
It might be a good idea to open a bug for that and add a link to the comment here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Depending on how the gapic/veneer files are structured we might need to have a different fix for replacing
logging_v2with something likelogging_v2.gapic, but yeah we wouldn't need a dictionary structure like it is now.