Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Add support for GHC 9.6 and GHC 9.8 - #130
Conversation
The GHC 9.8 support is blocked on: The rest looks fine. Do note that the mtl bump requires a code change so not all of this is just bounds stuff |
c8d6bf1 to
8846508CompareTeofilC
commented
Oct 29, 2024
This should be good now. I don't have the permissions I think to rerun CI |
Mikolaj
commented
Oct 29, 2024
Me neither. Could you maybe rebase and push? |
TeofilC
commented
Oct 29, 2024
I've pushed an empty commit and I'll drop it once CI has run, since this is already up-to-date with master |
TeofilC
commented
Oct 29, 2024
Huh I guess Windows and Mac are broken? They seem to lack the C libs |
the former is deprecated
ab51e52 to
dc2e3e3CompareTeofilC
commented
Nov 1, 2024
I've managed to get one of the MacOS jobs to pass at least but no luck with the rest. Could we merge this @Mikolaj and handle the rest later? Btw if you need a hand maintaining this repo and |
Mikolaj
commented
Nov 1, 2024
Makes sense. Anybody: any objections?
Oh, that would be great. I'm not the maintainer myself, I'm merely helping @maoe, who is currently busy, while the real maintainer, as you can see in the .cabal file, is @simonmar, whom I'd normally ask to extend the Hackage maintainers list on Hackage for Threadscope and ghc-events and to give any extra github permissions. |
Mikolaj
commented
Nov 5, 2024
I've heard no objections, so let me merge. |
This build upon #129 to add support for 9.6 and 9.8 as well.