Make a minor release: vector-0.12.2.0

[phadej]

For example I need unstreamM a PR of exporting which was merged in February last year.

[Shimuuar]

@lehins @Bodigrim I think we all agree that we need to make release. This issue seems like a good place for preparing 0.13. I'll look through issues over the weekend to pick ones that should be included into release. I think it's good idea to release all breaking changes at once

[lehins]

@Shimuuar 100% on board. Let me know if you need any help. I'll try to look through outstanding tickets as well and see if there is anything else worth implementing that requires breakage for the new major release.

One thing I do want to make sure is that the new version works with new upcoming ghc-9.0
haskell/primitive#296 has some compatibility problems, which probably won't affect vector directly, but we might not be able to confirm that vector is compatible until primitive is made compatible.

[phadej]

https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/head.hackage is an infrastructure to test against bleeding edge GHC (and have a patch for primitive).

[lehins]

@Shimuuar I do agree that we need a new major release soon, but after looking through the current trunk I don't think we have enough changes to justify a new breaking release. Here is my though process:

• We'll first fix issues that affect security and are indeed bugs that are dangerous: at least DV.Generic.Mutable.fill does not check for out of bounds access #118 and unfoldrN, unfoldrNM and fromListN are dangerous #301
• I will cherry pick all non-breaking changes from master into a feature branch vector-0.12.2.0 and make a release
• Within the next month or two we tackle and combine as much of the stuff as possible that is indeed breaking. So far we only have roles, drop ghc support for < 7.10 , MonadFIx instance and maximumBy stuff (let me know if I missed anything).

I'll go through all tickets one-by-one tomorrow and see what's feasible.

CC @Bodigrim How do you feel about the next major/minor release?

[Shimuuar]

I think #335 (not merged yet) alone justify 0.13. Just to be clear. What I meant by "preparing a release" is to decide what should be included into 0.13 and could be implemented reasonably fast (month or so).

I have no objection to 0.12.2.0 though

[Bodigrim]

drop ghc support for < 7.10

AFAIU this does not qualify as breaking: no existing build can be broken by this. It will be an unnecessary challenge to cherry-pick everything, while keeping compatibility with old GHCs.

How do you feel about the next major/minor release?

My preference is to focus efforts on a major release in a couple of months. But if someone has energy to spare for cherry-picking and testing vector-0.12.2.0, I will not oppose :)

[phadej]

If the timescale for next release is two months or more, then please tell so clearly. I could then not wait for it (i.e. copy needed functionality), and e.g. unsubscribe from this issue.

I didn't know that vector is in unreleaseable state.

[Bodigrim]

@phadej Theoretically we can release immediately as vector-0.13 and in a month or two - as vector-0.14. I just do not believe that ecosystem will be ready to accomodate such rapid changes in succession.

[phadej]

I'm fine with waiting as far as plan is communicated.

Two major releases is a bad idea. I will purposefully wait until vector-0.14 is released, so I don't need to go through my packages twice. You are right with "not ready to accomodate such rapid changes".

[lehins]

It sounds like we do want vector-0.12.2.0, I'll work on that.

AFAIU this does not qualify as breaking

You are right, it really does not qualify as a breaking change, but we have a moral obligation to our users. I'd personally hate if someone took away ghc support in a minor release.

@phadej Communicating: minor release that will include unstreamM will happen in about a week, vector-0.13 however is targeted in a couple of months. Let us know if it is not clear enough. Also, if you'd like to speed the whole process up, feel free to send us some money and we will put some more effort into project management and package maintenance. We are all putting our free time into the project, so If money is not an option then some politeness and appreciation will work great as currency too. What I am trying to say is that you are not our manager and your demanding tone is just not cool.

[phadej]

@lehins I'm sorry if I sound demanding, it wasn't my intention.

I'm also maintaining all of my OSS stuff on my free time, so knowing what and when is happening (or not) helps to plan that. (Except Cabal work, most of which is paid by Well-Typed's client, yet it isn't "my" project.)

I'm sorry for causing bad mood.

[lehins]

@phadej Thank you. I really appreciate it.

I'll re-open this ticket, so I can track release of vector-0.12.2 version, if it's ok with you, of course? Feel free to close it again and I'll open a new one otherwise

[phadej]

I unsubscribed from this one, so I shouldn't get notifications.