Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478

Open
Bug
#1738
Open
Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
Bug
#1738
Labels
enhancementNew feature or request
Milestone
1.0.4

Description

@DarioSamo
DarioSamo
opened on Feb 28, 2025

The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.

Image

The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.

The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    Bug

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
      Open
      Bug
      #1738
      Open
      Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
      Bug
      #1738
      Labels
      enhancementNew feature or request
      Milestone
      1.0.4
      Description
      @DarioSamo
      DarioSamo
      opened on Feb 28, 2025
      The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
      Image
      The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
      The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        enhancementNew feature or request
        Type
        Bug
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode
(function() {
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '
.markdown-body {
color-scheme: dark light;
}
.markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }
.markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }
.markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }
.markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }
.markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }
.markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }
';
document.head.appendChild(style);
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
          Open
          Bug
          #1738
          Open
          Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
          Bug
          #1738
          Labels
          enhancementNew feature or request
          Milestone
          1.0.4
          Description
          @DarioSamo
          DarioSamo
          opened on Feb 28, 2025
          The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
          Image
          The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
          The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            enhancementNew feature or request
            Type
            Bug
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer
(function() {
var ref = document.referrer;
var terms = [];
if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {
var url = new URL(ref);
var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');
if (q) {
terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });
}
}
if (terms.length === 0) return;
var style = document.createElement('style');
style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';
document.head.appendChild(style);
function highlight(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node
var text = node.textContent;
var found = false;
terms.forEach(function(term) {
var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi');
if (regex.test(text)) {
found = true;
var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();
var parts = text.split(regex);
parts.forEach(function(part, i) {
if (i % 2 === 0) {
frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));
} else {
var span = document.createElement('span');
span.className = 'userscript-highlight';
span.textContent = part;
frag.appendChild(span);
}
});
node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);
}
});
} else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element
var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];
if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {
Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);
}
}
}
highlight(document.body);
// Re-highlight on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
              Open
              Bug
              #1738
              Open
              Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
              Bug
              #1738
              Labels
              enhancementNew feature or request
              Milestone
              1.0.4
              Description
              @DarioSamo
              DarioSamo
              opened on Feb 28, 2025
              The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
              Image
              The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
              The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                enhancementNew feature or request
                Type
                Bug
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page
(function() {
var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',
'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',
'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];
function cleanUrl(url) {
try {
var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);
var changed = false;
trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {
if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {
u.searchParams.delete(p);
changed = true;
}
});
return changed ? u.toString() : url;
} catch (e) {
return url;
}
}
function cleanLinks() {
document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
cleanLinks();
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
mutations.forEach(function(m) {
m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {
if (node.nodeType === 1) {
if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();
node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {
var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);
if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;
});
}
});
});
});
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
                  Open
                  Bug
                  #1738
                  Open
                  Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
                  Bug
                  #1738
                  Labels
                  enhancementNew feature or request
                  Milestone
                  1.0.4
                  Description
                  @DarioSamo
                  DarioSamo
                  opened on Feb 28, 2025
                  The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
                  Image
                  The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
                  The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    enhancementNew feature or request
                    Type
                    Bug
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube
(function() {
function tryTheater() {
var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]');
if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {
btn.click();
}
}
// Try immediately
tryTheater();
// Try after navigation (SPA)
var lastUrl = location.href;
setInterval(function() {
if (location.href !== lastUrl) {
lastUrl = location.href;
setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);
}
}, 1000);
// Also try on player load
var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
                      Open
                      Bug
                      #1738
                      Open
                      Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
                      Bug
                      #1738
                      Labels
                      enhancementNew feature or request
                      Milestone
                      1.0.4
                      Description
                      @DarioSamo
                      DarioSamo
                      opened on Feb 28, 2025
                      The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
                      Image
                      The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
                      The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        enhancementNew feature or request
                        Type
                        Bug
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content
(function() {
function unstick() {
document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) {
if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {
el.style.position = 'static';
el.style.top = 'auto';
el.style.zIndex = 'auto';
}
});
}
unstick();
var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
                          Open
                          Bug
                          #1738
                          Open
                          Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
                          Bug
                          #1738
                          Labels
                          enhancementNew feature or request
                          Milestone
                          1.0.4
                          Description
                          @DarioSamo
                          DarioSamo
                          opened on Feb 28, 2025
                          The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
                          Image
                          The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
                          The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            enhancementNew feature or request
                            Type
                            Bug
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site
(function() {
var enabled = true;
function applyDarkMode() {
if (!enabled) return;
// Create style element if it doesn't exist
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (!style) {
style = document.createElement('style');
style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
// Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video
style.textContent = '
/* Invert everything except media */
html {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #1a1a2e !important;
}
/* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */
img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
}
/* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */
.no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,
[data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"],
.ace_editor, .ace_editor *,
.CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,
.monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,
.markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,
.highlight, .highlight *,
pre code, pre code * {
filter: none !important;
}
/* Fix common UI elements */
.modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;
background: #2d2d44 !important;
border-color: #444 !important;
}
/* Scrollbars */
::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }
/* Selection */
::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }
';
}
function removeDarkMode() {
var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');
if (style) style.remove();
}
// Toggle with Alt+Shift+D
document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {
e.preventDefault();
enabled = !enabled;
if (enabled) {
applyDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');
} else {
removeDarkMode();
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');
}
}
});
// Apply on load
applyDarkMode();
// Re-apply on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {
if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {
applyDarkMode();
}
});
observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });
console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order. #478
                              Open
                              Bug
                              #1738
                              Open
                              Missing piece of building in Skyscraper Scamper is dependent on the system's loading order.#478
                              Bug
                              #1738
                              Labels
                              enhancementNew feature or request
                              Milestone
                              1.0.4
                              Description
                              @DarioSamo
                              DarioSamo
                              opened on Feb 28, 2025
                              The part of the building that is gone here has a content error where it was assigned to a transparency layer despite being a solid mesh with depth writing enabled. The problem is, whether it'll appear above or below the clouds is entirely dependent on the loading order. Loading order is basically a race involving the background threads and seeing who finishes first.
                              Image
                              The issue doesn't usually happen in original hardware, and it also doesn't happen to me personally on Linux but it does happen with the very same hardware on Windows, hinting that the problem can be related to the CPU scheduler behavior of the OS and multiple other factors.
                              The easiest way to make this not dependent on the hardware or the system would be to patch the content error specifically for this model if the geometry is unmodified.
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                enhancementNew feature or request
                                Type
                                Bug
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions