onnx inpainting error

[pythoninoffice]

Describe the bug

With the latest code, I was able to convert the SD1.4 checkpoint into onnx and successfully run txt2img and img2img using the new onnx pipelines. However the onnx inpainting isn't working.

Thank you!

Reproduction

from diffusers import OnnxStableDiffusionInpaintPipeline
import io, requests, PIL

def download_image(url):
 response = requests.get(url)
 return PIL.Image.open(io.BytesIO(response.content)).convert("RGB")

img_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion/main/data/inpainting_examples/overture-creations-5sI6fQgYIuo.png"
mask_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/latent-diffusion/main/data/inpainting_examples/overture-creations-5sI6fQgYIuo_mask.png"

init_image = download_image(img_url).resize((512, 512))
mask_image = download_image(mask_url).resize((512, 512))



prompt = "a cat sitting on a bench"
denoiseStrength = 0.8
steps = 25
scale = 7.5

pipe = OnnxStableDiffusionInpaintPipeline.from_pretrained("./onnx", provider="DmlExecutionProvider")
image = pipe(prompt, image=init_image, mask_image=mask_image,
 strength=denoiseStrength, num_inference_steps=steps,
 guidance_scale=scale).images[0]
image.save("inp.png")

Logs

2022-10-19 21:49:48.9222990 [W:onnxruntime:, inference_session.cc:490 onnxruntime::InferenceSession::RegisterExecutionProvider] Having memory pattern enabled is not supported while using the DML Execution Provider. So disabling it for this session since it uses the DML Execution Provider.
2022-10-19 21:49:53.8425385 [W:onnxruntime:, inference_session.cc:490 onnxruntime::InferenceSession::RegisterExecutionProvider] Having memory pattern enabled is not supported while using the DML Execution Provider. So disabling it for this session since it uses the DML Execution Provider.
2022-10-19 21:49:54.7589366 [W:onnxruntime:, inference_session.cc:490 onnxruntime::InferenceSession::RegisterExecutionProvider] Having memory pattern enabled is not supported while using the DML Execution Provider. So disabling it for this session since it uses the DML Execution Provider.
2022-10-19 21:49:56.2920566 [W:onnxruntime:, inference_session.cc:490 onnxruntime::InferenceSession::RegisterExecutionProvider] Having memory pattern enabled is not supported while using the DML Execution Provider. So disabling it for this session since it uses the DML Execution Provider.
2022-10-19 21:49:57.3330294 [W:onnxruntime:, inference_session.cc:490 onnxruntime::InferenceSession::RegisterExecutionProvider] Having memory pattern enabled is not supported while using the DML Execution Provider. So disabling it for this session since it uses the DML Execution Provider.
 0%| | 0/26 [00:00<?, ?it/s]2022-10-19 21:50:01.5112469 [E:onnxruntime:, sequential_executor.cc:369 onnxruntime::SequentialExecutor::Execute] Non-zero status code returned while running Conv node. Name:'Conv_168' Status Message: D:\a\_work\1\s\onnxruntime\core\providers\dml\DmlExecutionProvider\src\MLOperatorAuthorImpl.cpp(1866)\onnxruntime_pybind11_state.pyd!00007FFBF0CDA4CA: (caller: 00007FFBF0CDBACF) Exception(3) tid(4a5c) 80070057 The parameter is incorrect.

 0%| | 0/26 [00:00<?, ?it/s]
Traceback (most recent call last):
 File "E:\PythonInOffice\amd_sd_img2img\inp.py", line 22, in <module>
 image = pipe(prompt, image=init_image, mask_image=mask_image,
 File "E:\PythonInOffice\amd_sd_img2img\diffuers_venv\lib\site-packages\torch\autograd\grad_mode.py", line 27, in decorate_context
 return func(*args, **kwargs)
 File "E:\PythonInOffice\amd_sd_img2img\diffusers\src\diffusers\pipelines\stable_diffusion\pipeline_onnx_stable_diffusion_inpaint.py", line 352, in __call__
 noise_pred = self.unet(
 File "E:\PythonInOffice\amd_sd_img2img\diffusers\src\diffusers\onnx_utils.py", line 46, in __call__
 return self.model.run(None, inputs)
 File "E:\PythonInOffice\amd_sd_img2img\diffuers_venv\lib\site-packages\onnxruntime\capi\onnxruntime_inference_collection.py", line 200, in run
 return self._sess.run(output_names, input_feed, run_options)
onnxruntime.capi.onnxruntime_pybind11_state.RuntimeException: [ONNXRuntimeError] : 6 : RUNTIME_EXCEPTION : Non-zero status code returned while running Conv node. Name:'Conv_168' Status Message: D:\a\_work\1\s\onnxruntime\core\providers\dml\DmlExecutionProvider\src\MLOperatorAuthorImpl.cpp(1866)\onnxruntime_pybind11_state.pyd!00007FFBF0CDA4CA: (caller: 00007FFBF0CDBACF) Exception(3) tid(4a5c) 80070057 The parameter is incorrect.

System Info

diffuser version: 2a0c823

[patrickvonplaten]

cc @anton-l could you take this one? :-)

[anton-l]

Hi @pythoninoffice! With the release of https://huggingface.co/spaces/runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting we've decided to make the onnx inpainting pipeline work with finetuned checkpoints only (as the non-finetuned SD1.4 checkpoint wasn't nearly as good in terms of inpainting quality).

The way to load those weights is:

from diffusers import OnnxStableDiffusionInpaintPipeline

pipeline = OnnxStableDiffusionInpaintPipeline.from_pretrained(
 "runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting", revision="onnx", provider="CPUExecutionProvider"
)

The pytorch-to-onnx conversion script also supports custom finetuned checkpoints trained in a similar fashion, i.e. with 9 input channels for the UNet (4 latent + 2 mask + 3 masked image channels)

Alternatively, you can still use the pytorch inpainting pipeline that handles non-finetuned SD checkpoints: StableDiffusionInpaintPipelineLegacy

[pythoninoffice]

Hi @anton-l appreciate your response! I can confirm the onnx inpainting pipeline works with the runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting checkpoints which seem to be SD v1.2 model based on the Model card/description.

I also downloaded https://huggingface.co/runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5 unfortunately it doesn't work with the new pipeline either (same error). So it seems like SD1.2 is the only version compatible with onnx inpainting?

Do you know if there's any way to convert a non-finetuned checkpoint to fine-tuned checkpoint? I'm pretty new to diffusers so please bear with me if the question doesn't make sense. Thank you!

[patrickvonplaten]

Gently ping @anton-l

[anton-l]

@pythoninoffice in the current release only runwayml/stable-diffusion-inpainting is compatible with onnx inpainting, since it needs a finetuned model.
As for models that are not finetuned for inpainting, both runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5 and the CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-N checkpoints are compatible with the pytorch pipeline StableDiffusionInpaintPipelineLegacy, but it doesn't have an onnx counterpart.

[pythoninoffice]

@anton-l Thanks for the answer and apologies for my slow response!
A quick follow-up question - is there any way to convert an existing model into a finetuned one, so that we can use it for OnnxStableDiffusionInpaintPipeline? Thanks!