Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all \u003cpre\u003e\u003ccode\u003e blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "github.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length \u003e 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps - #288

Open
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule
Open

Remove package.json lint rule for no devdeps#288
mattheu wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
remove-prefer-no-devdeps-rule

Conversation

@mattheu

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

We are using npm-package-json-lint to check that our package.json files comply with certain rules.

One of these rules is configured so that you are not allowed to use devDependencies in the packages, but it's OK at the top-level. However this test fails because we have devDependencies in the eslint config package.

Seems to me that we should just disable this rule. I'm not sure why it has ever passed TBH.

@ntwb

ntwb commented Aug 8, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is because the devDependencies need to be moved from the ESLint package to the root package.json

This just hasn't happened yet and is why this rule is only set to warning which is why CI runs currently pass

"prefer-no-devDependencies": "warning",

E.g. via https://app.travis-ci.com/github/humanmade/coding-standards/jobs/578616221#L262-L270

image

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattheu@ntwb