chore(ci): bump governance-reusable pin to standards main

[hyperpolymath]

Pinned revision 81dbf2dd of governance-reusable.yml carries two bugs that make Governance red on every consumer:

1. Workflow security linter runs bash scripts/update-actions-lock.sh --verify-local in the caller's checkout, where the script does not exist — exit 127.
2. Allowlist Preflight runs check-actions-policy.sh with an empty GH_TOKEN — gh refuses, exit 3.

Both are cured on standards main (fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2): the verifier is copied into \$RUNNER_TEMP, and the policy step is skipped when no credential is supplied.

Witness: verified green on hyperpolymath/blocky-writer#55 at this exact SHA — governance run completed/success, 15/15 jobs, including the two jobs that were red on that repo's default branch.

Judge this PR by the set difference against your own default branch (which governance jobs are newly red), not by overall check colour — unrelated build failures may pre-date it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 32d68b61-3dbb-481b-9f35-f4454e7b70e5

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a255daa and d13140d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/governance.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (18)

• GitHub Check: governance / Validate Hypatia Baseline
• GitHub Check: Dogfooding compliance summary
• GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
• GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
• GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
• GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
• GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
• GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
• GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
• GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
• GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
• GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
• GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
• GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
• GitHub Check: lint-workflows

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/governance.yml (1)

17-17: LGTM!

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the project’s governance automation workflow to use the latest approved revision.
  • No changes to user-facing functionality or public interfaces.

Walkthrough

The governance job now pins the reusable governance workflow to commit fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2.

Changes

Governance workflow

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update reusable workflow reference .github/workflows/governance.yml	The governance job now uses commit fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2 of the reusable workflow.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to d1314

The governance workflow now uses the updated pinned reusable workflow revision, addressing the reported verifier-path and missing-credential failures. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

Poem

A rabbit checks the workflow pin
A newer revision hops in
The governance path runs clear
One small change, precise and neat
Carrots cheer the update here

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the CI change: updating the pinned governance workflow revision.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the revision update, the two prior governance failures, the fixes, and the reported verification result.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud