chore(ci): bump governance-reusable pin to standards main

[hyperpolymath]

Pinned revision 84355587 of governance-reusable.yml carries two bugs that make Governance red on every consumer:

1. Workflow security linter runs bash scripts/update-actions-lock.sh --verify-local in the caller's checkout, where the script does not exist — exit 127.
2. Allowlist Preflight runs check-actions-policy.sh with an empty GH_TOKEN — gh refuses, exit 3.

Both are cured on standards main (fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2): the verifier is copied into \$RUNNER_TEMP, and the policy step is skipped when no credential is supplied.

Witness: verified green on hyperpolymath/blocky-writer#55 at this exact SHA — governance run completed/success, 15/15 jobs, including the two jobs that were red on that repo's default branch.

Judge this PR by the set difference against your own default branch (which governance jobs are newly red), not by overall check colour — unrelated build failures may pre-date it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 95bc72c1-70a4-4b48-a387-191c072b1246

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82d11ba and 6b9bb15.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/governance.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (19)

• GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
• GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
• GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
• GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
• GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
• GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
• GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
• GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
• GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
• GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
• GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
• GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
• GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
• GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
• GitHub Check: CodeQL Analysis (actions, none)
• GitHub Check: doc-lint

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/governance.yml (1)

36-36: LGTM!

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the governance workflow to use a newer pinned version of the shared workflow.

Walkthrough

The governance workflow now references a newer pinned commit of the shared reusable governance workflow.

Changes

Governance workflow

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update workflow reference .github/workflows/governance.yml	The shared governance workflow reference now uses commit fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 6b9bb

The governance workflow now uses the updated pinned reusable workflow revision. No current merge-blocking risk is identified.

Poem

A rabbit checks the workflow line
A newer commit now makes it shine
The pin is neat, the path is clear
Governance hops ahead this year
One small change, and all is well

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: updating the pinned governance reusable workflow revision.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains the pin update, the defects in the previous revision, and validation of the new revision.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}