chore(ci): bump governance-reusable pin to standards main

[hyperpolymath]

Pinned revision bd0df9ea of governance-reusable.yml carries two bugs that make Governance red on every consumer:

1. Workflow security linter runs bash scripts/update-actions-lock.sh --verify-local in the caller's checkout, where the script does not exist — exit 127.
2. Allowlist Preflight runs check-actions-policy.sh with an empty GH_TOKEN — gh refuses, exit 3.

Both are cured on standards main (fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2): the verifier is copied into \$RUNNER_TEMP, and the policy step is skipped when no credential is supplied.

Witness: verified green on hyperpolymath/blocky-writer#55 at this exact SHA — governance run completed/success, 15/15 jobs, including the two jobs that were red on that repo's default branch.

Judge this PR by the set difference against your own default branch (which governance jobs are newly red), not by overall check colour — unrelated build failures may pre-date it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: 68857bc8-9831-4ccc-b6ae-9eedac2bf988

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 226fa1d and a3d5bb1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/governance.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (19)

• GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
• GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
• GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
• GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
• GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
• GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
• GitHub Check: governance / Allowlist Preflight
• GitHub Check: governance / Well-Known (RFC 9116 + RSR)
• GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
• GitHub Check: governance / Language / package anti-pattern policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
• GitHub Check: governance / Security policy checks
• GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
• GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
• GitHub Check: governance / Check Workflow Staleness
• GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
• GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
• GitHub Check: analyze (javascript-typescript, none)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/governance.yml (1)

19-19: LGTM!

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the governance workflow to use a newer pinned workflow revision.

Walkthrough

The governance workflow now references a newer pinned revision of governance-reusable.yml.

Changes

Governance workflow

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update reusable workflow pin .github/workflows/governance.yml	The workflow pin changes from bd0df9ead7faf0cdfe0e13e7966d91e28d0101d4 to fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to a3d5b

This updates the pinned governance workflow revision to incorporate the reported workflow fixes. No current merge-blocking risk was identified.

Poem

A rabbit checks the workflow line
A newer pin now marks the sign
The governance path runs true
With a revision fresh and new
Hop, hop, the update is through

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the governance workflow pin update.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the pin update, the two governance failures, the fixes, and the verification result. It is directly related to the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}