chore(ci): bump governance-reusable pin to standards main

[hyperpolymath]

Pinned revision 81dbf2dd of governance-reusable.yml carries two bugs that make Governance red on every consumer:

1. Workflow security linter runs bash scripts/update-actions-lock.sh --verify-local in the caller's checkout, where the script does not exist — exit 127.
2. Allowlist Preflight runs check-actions-policy.sh with an empty GH_TOKEN — gh refuses, exit 3.

Both are cured on standards main (fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2): the verifier is copied into \$RUNNER_TEMP, and the policy step is skipped when no credential is supplied.

Witness: verified green on hyperpolymath/blocky-writer#55 at this exact SHA — governance run completed/success, 15/15 jobs, including the two jobs that were red on that repo's default branch.

Judge this PR by the set difference against your own default branch (which governance jobs are newly red), not by overall check colour — unrelated build failures may pre-date it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) noreply@anthropic.com

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Team

Run ID: cb3e1b66-10f9-4ae9-9a69-f95cc9346037

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b5ebbb and 5d5ae05.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/governance.yml

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📜 Recent review details

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (17)

• GitHub Check: governance / Validate Hypatia Baseline
• GitHub Check: governance / Licence consistency
• GitHub Check: governance / Trusted-base reduction policy
• GitHub Check: governance / Actions lockfile verify
• GitHub Check: governance / Workflow security linter
• GitHub Check: governance / Exemption ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Debt ratchet
• GitHub Check: governance / Live Actions policy (credentialed advisory)
• GitHub Check: governance / Guix packaging policy (Nix retired)
• GitHub Check: governance / Code quality + docs
• GitHub Check: scan / gitleaks
• GitHub Check: scan / rust-secrets
• GitHub Check: scan / shell-secrets
• GitHub Check: scan / Hypatia Neurosymbolic Analysis
• GitHub Check: analyze (actions, none)
• GitHub Check: Empty-linter (invisible characters)
• GitHub Check: Validate K9 contracts

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/governance.yml (1)

17-17: LGTM!

---

📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the governance workflow to use a newer pinned version of its reusable workflow.

Walkthrough

The governance job now references the reusable workflow at commit fad242d35291de1898242d6737ba02b74a59a2f2 instead of the previous commit.

Changes

Governance workflow

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update reusable workflow pin .github/workflows/governance.yml	The governance job uses the new pinned reusable workflow commit.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk:⚪ Minimal · up to 5d5ae

The governance workflow now uses the intended pinned reusable-workflow revision, with no current merge-blocking risk identified.

Poem

A rabbit checks the workflow line
The governance pin is now aligned
One SHA changed in place
The job keeps its pace
And hops through the pipeline fine

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the CI change: updating the pinned governance reusable workflow revision to the standards main revision.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description directly explains the pin update, the two corrected Governance failures, and the reported verification result.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}