Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Use overintegration in WADG - #354

Draft
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg
Draft

Use overintegration in WADG#354
MTCam wants to merge 6 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
illinois-ceesd:overintegration-for-wadg

Conversation

@MTCam

@MTCamMTCam commented Jul 19, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This change set is intended to update WADG to use overintegration (#173).

TODO:

  • Add tests
  • Recombine multiple stages into 2 loopy calls
  • Refactor back into original _apply_inverse_mass_operator

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +852 to +855
inv_area_elements = 1/project(
dcoll, dd_base, dd_quad, area_element(
actx, dcoll, dd=dd_base,
_use_geoderiv_connection=actx.supports_nonscalar_broadcasting))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The area element is already nonlinear. Its computation should take place on the target discretization.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py
"ij,ej->ei",
ref_inv_mass,
vec,
tagged=(FirstAxisIsElementsTag(),))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use axis tags, not this. Also below.

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +865 to +868
# Compute 1/J * vec
def apply_jinv_to_vec(jac_inv, vec):
return actx.einsum(
"ei,ej->ei",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean just * here, i.e. element-wise multiplication? This einsum will sum over each element!

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
Comment on lines +832 to +837
if dd_out != dd_in:
raise ValueError(
"Cannot compute inverse of a mass matrix mapping "
"between different element groups; inverse is not "
"guaranteed to be well-defined"
)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why have both dd_in and dd_out, if having them differ is not appropriate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wondered that myself :). Copied from the original _apply_inverse_mass:

ifdd_out!=dd_in:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed up in 45d6388

Comment threadgrudge/op.py Outdated
for grp, vec_i in zip(discr_base.groups, stage3)
]

return DOFArray(actx, data=tuple(group_data))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why build many intermediate DOFArrays as opposed to constructing the final one in one go?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MTCam@inducer