Skip to content

Loop nest constraints - #347

Closed
jdsteve2 wants to merge 82 commits into
cartoon-dependency-graph-from-new-deps-for-linearizationfrom
loop-nest-constraints-v2
Closed

Loop nest constraints#347
jdsteve2 wants to merge 82 commits into
cartoon-dependency-graph-from-new-deps-for-linearizationfrom
loop-nest-constraints-v2

Conversation

@jdsteve2

@jdsteve2jdsteve2 commented Apr 26, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

THIS PR HAS BEEN REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING TWO PRs AGAINST MAIN

transformations where loop nest constraints handled:

  • split_iname
  • remove_unused_inames
  • duplicate_inames
  • rename_iname
    • (when new iname doesn't exist)
    • (when new iname DOES exist)
  • (?) tag_inames (currently just erroring if must-nest iname gets tagged as concurrent... anything else need to be done here?
  • join_inames
    • (when within is None)
    • (when within is not None)
  • map_domain

Previous (upstream) PR in chain

…constraints from old branch (https://gitlab.tiker.net/jdsteve2/loopy/iname-sets-in-loop-priorities): UnexpandedInameSet, LoopNestConstraints, process_loop_nest_specification, constrain_loop_nesting, update_must_nest_graph, _expand_iname_sets_in_tuple, check_must_not_nest, check_must_not_nest_against_must_nest_graph
…om previous branch (https://gitlab.tiker.net/jdsteve2/loopy/iname-sets-in-loop-priorities): check_must_nest(), is_loop_nesting_valid(); rename function is_loop_nesting_valid->loop_nest_constraints_satisfied
@jdsteve2jdsteve2 changed the title Loop nest constraints v2Loop nest constraintsApr 26, 2021
jdsteve2 added 22 commits May 8, 2021 23:38
@jdsteve2

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing this PR since it has been replaced by the two PRs linked above. May still be useful to come back and look at this though...

@jdsteve2jdsteve2 closed this Aug 3, 2021
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@jdsteve2