Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376

Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
153-in-range
Draft

Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
153-in-range

Conversation

@jackfirth

@jackfirthjackfirth commented Oct 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Closes#153 and closes#369.

I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.

@jackfirthjackfirth added enhancement New feature or request new lint Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints labels Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible - #376
Draft
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Draft
Refactor in-range to in-inclusive-range when possible#376
jackfirth wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom 
153-in-range
Conversation
@jackfirth
@jackfirthjackfirth
commented
Oct 20, 2024

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Closes#153 and closes#369.
I'm keeping this open as a draft for now. It relies on a patch to Racket to emit a 'disappeared-visit syntax property. I'm not sure yet if this will work for uses of in-range in for at higher phases.
@jackfirthjackfirth
added

enhancement
New feature or request
new lint
Issues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints
labels
Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels

enhancementNew feature or requestnew lintIssues suggesting new lints or pull requests implementing new lints

Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Disappeared visit tracking

Suggest using in-inclusive-range instead of in-range

1 participant

@jackfirth