Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3

Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom
ywoelker:Arm64
Open

Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom
ywoelker:Arm64

Conversation

@ywoelker

@ywoelkerywoelker commented Mar 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.

@kathoef

kathoef commented May 15, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.

Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)

I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef

, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

Skip to content
Adding support for arm64 architecture. - #3
Open
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Open
Adding support for arm64 architecture.#3
ywoelker wants to merge 1 commit into
kathoef:mainfrom 
ywoelker:Arm64
Conversation
@ywoelker
@ywoelkerywoelker
commented
Mar 18, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

With the new Apple M1 chips (arm64 architecture) the conversion of Docker images to Singularity images with this container needs twice as much time. I tried to add support for building this Docker image with the amd64 and arm64 architecture and upload both of them to Docker Hub so no one has to care and can pull the image with the matching architecture.
@kathoef
kathoef
commented
May 15, 2022

Copy link


Copy Markdown

Owner
Thank you a lot! It took a while, but today I finally had the time to look into your PR. It seems, there were a bit more Github actions related things to add in order to make the arm64 build work.
Since at the moment, unfortunately, I don't have time to work on such projects together, I took the shortcut and implemented further required changes in #4 myself. (This also includes changes to the Go binary architecture and to Singularity itself, which is now maintained as Apptainer, and was not installing anymore from the URL that was specified in the Dockerfile.)
I would be very happy, if you could test the arm64 image that will be available on Dockerhub when the currently running workflow succeeded, and if you could provide a PR with container build example commands for the README.md? Of particular interest: How to build and convert amd64 container images on arm64 machines, which is, I suppose, what should be done for running the Singularity image on the target HPC system architecture? @willirath mentioned you did a few tests and having details about how to do this would be very helpful!
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Reviewers


No reviews


Assignees


No one assigned


Labels


None yet


Projects


None yet


Milestone


No milestone


Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@ywoelker@kathoef