Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Restore the quality gate as blocking - #331
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This was referenced Aug 25, 2026
This was referenced Aug 26, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Removes the temporary
continue-on-errorfrom theEnd SonarQubestep, closing #328.Why it was there
The workflow sets
sonar.qualitygate.wait=true, so a failed quality gate fails the step and blocks the release. That could not take effect usefully while the new-code period was meaningless.SonarCloud's period was correctly set to "previous version", but the scanner was never passed
/v:, so the project version read asnot providedand the period had no boundary to anchor to. It fell back to the earliest analysis, dated 2025-07-30, which made "new code" 49,630 lines and turned the new-code coverage condition into a measure of the entire codebase. Reaching 80% under that definition would have meant covering roughly 1,538 more lines. It was never a testing gap.Passing
/v:fixed the cause, and it needed two analyses to take effect, because "previous version" needs a prior analysis carrying a different version.It has taken effect
v3.11.0supplied the second boundary:not provided3.11.0new_security_ratingnew_security_hotspots_reviewednew_coverageThe two security conditions were fixed separately, by pinning
dependabot/fetch-metadatato a commit SHA and by suppressing acsharpsquid:S6640onSequencer.cswhere the pointer lifetime is provably scoped to itsfixedblock.What changes
A failed quality gate now blocks the release, for the first time genuinely, since the gate is at last measuring the code a change actually touched rather than thirteen months of history.
The escape hatch and its comment block are gone. actionlint reports 0 errors.