str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

Description

@kuri65536

in x86 system

>>> str(0.1)
"0.1"

in py4a

>>> str(0.1)
'0.1000000000000000056'

This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

case

This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

uncompyle6 contains below code

src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
key= (1.5, 1.6)
src[str(key[1])]
>>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

work around

round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

>>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
"1.6"

so previous example might be

>>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
>>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
>>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
"somevalue"

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
       blocks
      (function() {
      function addCopyButtons() {
      document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
      if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
      codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
      var btn = document.createElement('button');
      btn.textContent = 'Copy';
      btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
      btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
      btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
      btn.onclick = function() {
      navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
      btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
      setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
      });
      };
      codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
      codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
      });
      }
      addCopyButtons();
      // Re-run on dynamic content
      var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
      observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
      })();
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

      Description

      @kuri65536

      in x86 system

      >>> str(0.1)
      "0.1"
      

      in py4a

      >>> str(0.1)
      '0.1000000000000000056'
      

      This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
      I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

      I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
      but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

      case

      This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
      When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

      uncompyle6 contains below code

      src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
      key= (1.5, 1.6)
      src[str(key[1])]
      >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

      work around

      round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

      >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
      "1.6"
      

      so previous example might be

      >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
      >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
      >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
      "somevalue"
      

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

          Description

          @kuri65536

          in x86 system

          >>> str(0.1)
          "0.1"
          

          in py4a

          >>> str(0.1)
          '0.1000000000000000056'
          

          This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
          I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

          I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
          but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

          case

          This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
          When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

          uncompyle6 contains below code

          src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
          key= (1.5, 1.6)
          src[str(key[1])]
          >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

          work around

          round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

          >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
          "1.6"
          

          so previous example might be

          >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
          >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
          >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
          "somevalue"
          

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

              Description

              @kuri65536

              in x86 system

              >>> str(0.1)
              "0.1"
              

              in py4a

              >>> str(0.1)
              '0.1000000000000000056'
              

              This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
              I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

              I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
              but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

              case

              This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
              When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

              uncompyle6 contains below code

              src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
              key= (1.5, 1.6)
              src[str(key[1])]
              >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

              work around

              round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

              >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
              "1.6"
              

              so previous example might be

              >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
              >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
              >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
              "somevalue"
              

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

                  Description

                  @kuri65536

                  in x86 system

                  >>> str(0.1)
                  "0.1"
                  

                  in py4a

                  >>> str(0.1)
                  '0.1000000000000000056'
                  

                  This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
                  I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

                  I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
                  but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

                  case

                  This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
                  When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

                  uncompyle6 contains below code

                  src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                  key= (1.5, 1.6)
                  src[str(key[1])]
                  >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

                  work around

                  round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

                  >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
                  "1.6"
                  

                  so previous example might be

                  >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                  >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
                  >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
                  "somevalue"
                  

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

                      Description

                      @kuri65536

                      in x86 system

                      >>> str(0.1)
                      "0.1"
                      

                      in py4a

                      >>> str(0.1)
                      '0.1000000000000000056'
                      

                      This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
                      I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

                      I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
                      but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

                      case

                      This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
                      When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

                      uncompyle6 contains below code

                      src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                      key= (1.5, 1.6)
                      src[str(key[1])]
                      >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

                      work around

                      round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

                      >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
                      "1.6"
                      

                      so previous example might be

                      >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                      >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
                      >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
                      "somevalue"
                      

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

                          Description

                          @kuri65536

                          in x86 system

                          >>> str(0.1)
                          "0.1"
                          

                          in py4a

                          >>> str(0.1)
                          '0.1000000000000000056'
                          

                          This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
                          I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

                          I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
                          but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

                          case

                          This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
                          When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

                          uncompyle6 contains below code

                          src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                          key= (1.5, 1.6)
                          src[str(key[1])]
                          >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

                          work around

                          round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

                          >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
                          "1.6"
                          

                          so previous example might be

                          >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                          >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
                          >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
                          "somevalue"
                          

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              str(0.1) aka float.__format__ outputs are different to another platform #155

                              Description

                              @kuri65536

                              in x86 system

                              >>> str(0.1)
                              "0.1"
                              

                              in py4a

                              >>> str(0.1)
                              '0.1000000000000000056'
                              

                              This is not precision issue, this is float.format behavior difference.
                              I couldn't find the this behavior is guaranteed at all platform in python documents.

                              I think this was caused by bionic library and python program combination
                              but I did not have many time to solve and investigate this prlaboblem.

                              case

                              This problem is found and reported by @gaurav ,
                              When he try to use uncompyle6 library .

                              uncompyle6 contains below code

                              src= {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                              key= (1.5, 1.6)
                              src[str(key[1])]
                              >>>causeKeyError: key'1.6000000000000000888'notfound

                              work around

                              round the value up. don't use loose str, you can specify the format you want.

                              >>> "%3.1f" % 1.6
                              "1.6"
                              

                              so previous example might be

                              >>> src = {"1.5": "somevalue", "1.6": "somevalue"}
                              >>> key = (1.5, 1.6)
                              >>> src["%3.1f" % key[1]]
                              "somevalue"
                              

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions