Complete field follow-ups #2482

Description

@MisRob

Summary

  1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

Selection_001

  1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

  2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

  3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
     blocks
    (function() {
    function addCopyButtons() {
    document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
    if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
    codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
    var btn = document.createElement('button');
    btn.textContent = 'Copy';
    btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
    btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
    btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
    btn.onclick = function() {
    navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
    btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
    setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
    });
    };
    codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
    codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
    });
    }
    addCopyButtons();
    // Re-run on dynamic content
    var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
    observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
    })();
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    Complete field follow-ups #2482

    Description

    @MisRob

    Summary

    1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

    Selection_001

    1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

    2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

    3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      Complete field follow-ups #2482

      Description

      @MisRob

      Summary

      1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

      Selection_001

      1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

      2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

      3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Labels

      P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        Complete field follow-ups #2482

        Description

        @MisRob

        Summary

        1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

        Selection_001

        1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

        2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

        3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Labels

        P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          Complete field follow-ups #2482

          Description

          @MisRob

          Summary

          1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

          Selection_001

          1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

          2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

          3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Labels

          P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            Complete field follow-ups #2482

            Description

            @MisRob

            Summary

            1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

            Selection_001

            1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

            2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

            3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Labels

            P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Complete field follow-ups #2482

              Description

              @MisRob

              Summary

              1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

              Selection_001

              1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

              2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

              3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Labels

              P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                Complete field follow-ups #2482

                Description

                @MisRob

                Summary

                1. Investigate, fix and add tests for an issue described here:

                Selection_001

                1. Add a basic test suite to every place that builds on complete field to get more confidence as currently, client is the only entity responsible for marking a node as complete

                2. Rename validate... functions (e.g. validateNodeMasteryModel) to get...Errors (e.g. getNodeMasteryModelErrors. Current naming has shown to be very confusing

                3. Add type checks and warnings for developers to isNodeComplete function to make clear that it needs to receive a complete information about a node. For example, if we want the function to check if an exercise is complete, we need to provide its assessment items (if we forget, complete will be evaluated to false even if the node is complete). Therefore, let's throw a warning if a node is an exercise but assessmentItems property is undefined. Prepare similar checks for files.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Labels

                P0 - criticalPriority: Release blocker or regressionbug

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions