Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

Description

@TomokiMuto

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

'getnextnumber' => [
'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
],

The supported strategies could be:

  • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
  • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

Describe alternatives you've considered

The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

Additional context

The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

      Description

      @TomokiMuto

      Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

      App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

      For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

      In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

      Describe the solution you'd like

      Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

      'getnextnumber' => [
      'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
      'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
      'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
      ],

      The supported strategies could be:

      • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
      • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

      For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

      Describe alternatives you've considered

      The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

      Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

      Additional context

      The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

      I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

          Description

          @TomokiMuto

          Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

          App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

          For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

          In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

          Describe the solution you'd like

          Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

          'getnextnumber' => [
          'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
          'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
          'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
          ],

          The supported strategies could be:

          • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
          • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

          For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

          Describe alternatives you've considered

          The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

          Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

          Additional context

          The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

          I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

              Description

              @TomokiMuto

              Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

              App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

              For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

              In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

              Describe the solution you'd like

              Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

              'getnextnumber' => [
              'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
              'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
              'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
              ],

              The supported strategies could be:

              • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
              • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

              For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

              Describe alternatives you've considered

              The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

              Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

              Additional context

              The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

              I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

                  Description

                  @TomokiMuto

                  Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

                  App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

                  For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

                  In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

                  Describe the solution you'd like

                  Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

                  'getnextnumber' => [
                  'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                  'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                  'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
                  ],

                  The supported strategies could be:

                  • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
                  • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

                  For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

                  Describe alternatives you've considered

                  The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

                  Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

                  Additional context

                  The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

                  I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

                      Description

                      @TomokiMuto

                      Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

                      App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

                      For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

                      In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

                      Describe the solution you'd like

                      Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

                      'getnextnumber' => [
                      'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                      'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                      'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
                      ],

                      The supported strategies could be:

                      • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
                      • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

                      For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

                      Describe alternatives you've considered

                      The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

                      Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

                      Additional context

                      The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

                      I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

                          Description

                          @TomokiMuto

                          Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

                          App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

                          For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

                          In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

                          Describe the solution you'd like

                          Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

                          'getnextnumber' => [
                          'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                          'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                          'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
                          ],

                          The supported strategies could be:

                          • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
                          • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

                          For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

                          Describe alternatives you've considered

                          The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

                          Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

                          Additional context

                          The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

                          I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Add configurable number-allocation strategy for getNextNumber() (avoid reusing freed uidNumber/gidNumber) #474

                              Description

                              @TomokiMuto

                              Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

                              App\Classes\Template::getNextNumber() currently always selects the first available number starting from pla.template.getnextnumber.<attr>.

                              For example, if numbers 5000 through 5114 have been allocated but 5017 was freed by deleting a user, the next entry created receives uidNumber=5017 instead of 5115.

                              In POSIX/Samba environments, reusing a freed uidNumber or gidNumber can be unsafe. The old numeric ID may still be referenced by file ownership, home directories, backups, or ACLs. Reassigning it can therefore unintentionally grant the new account access to files belonging to the previous account.

                              Describe the solution you'd like

                              Add a configurable allocation strategy alongside the existing per-attribute starting values, for example:

                              'getnextnumber' => [
                              'uidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_UIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                              'gidnumber' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GIDNUMBER_START', 1000),
                              'strategy' => env('LDAP_TEMPLATE_GETNEXTNUMBER_STRATEGY', 'first_gap'),
                              ],

                              The supported strategies could be:

                              • first_gap: select the first available number from the configured starting value. This is the current behavior and should remain the default for backward compatibility.
                              • max_plus_one: scan all existing values and return the highest value found plus one.

                              For max_plus_one, the maximum should be determined only after the complete directory scan, including the existing pagination/sizelimit loop, has finished.

                              Describe alternatives you've considered

                              The next value can be determined externally by querying all existing uidNumber or gidNumber values and calculating the maximum plus one. However, this requires manual work or separate provisioning logic and bypasses the convenience of the template’s automatic number allocation.

                              Increasing the configured starting value also does not solve the underlying issue, because gaps above that value can still be reused.

                              Additional context

                              The existing first_gap behavior should remain the default so that current installations are not affected.

                              I would be happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds reasonable. I wanted to confirm the preferred direction first because this changes shared numbering behavior.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions