Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Resolves #10 : Making testing-framework module - #11
Conversation
gabor1
commented
Jul 11, 2021
Do you need all these eggs checked in? |
LarsSchaaf
commented
Jul 11, 2021
Sorry my mistake! I'll create new pull request |
stenczelt
commented
Jul 12, 2021
great work @LarsSchaaf, I will take a look later today |
stenczelt
commented
Jul 12, 2021
don't worry just remove from this one with a commit or force push a modified version to the same commit, no need for a new pull request :) |
stenczelt
commented
Jul 23, 2021
@LarsSchaaf do you actually need see: |
stenczelt
commented
Jul 23, 2021
wait are there even unittests? the tests we have are the science tests here, not ones that |
| version=version["__version__"], | ||
| description=DESCRIPTION, | ||
| long_description=open("README.md").read(), | ||
| install_requires=["scipy", "numpy", "matplotlib", "pandas>=0.21.0", "scipy",], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- scipy is duplicated
- ase is not there
- pandas is only used in the demo notebook, not the package
- anything else?
there are optional dependencies, that I wouldn't want to install unless needed, like torch, torchani, pyjulip, etc.
| tests_require=["pytest",], | ||
| author=AUTHOR, | ||
| author_email=AUTHOR_EMAIL, | ||
| package_data={"": ["data/*", "calib/data/*"],}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these directories don't seem to exist
| from setuptools import setup, find_packages | ||
| PACKAGENAME = "testingframework" | ||
| DESCRIPTION = "Module for testing various interatomic potentials" |
| setup( | ||
| name=PACKAGENAME, | ||
| packages=find_packages(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there is no __init__.py in the testingframework directory, that may be useful there
| packages=find_packages(), | ||
| version=version["__version__"], | ||
| description=DESCRIPTION, | ||
| long_description=open("README.md").read(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shall we read this in above just like the other parts? just being a little petty here, but with ... as is nicer for this, even though we can be pretty sure that the file will be closed properly like this as well.
stenczelt
commented
Jul 23, 2021
Finally, @LarsSchaaf can you confirm that you have installed this and used the testing of a model correctly and this reproduces the behaviour as before, or that you can document how the testing should be modified now? Once all these are done, I think it would be useful if you asked @jameskermode and @bernstei to take a look as well, because they are the longest standing users here perhaps. |
Done:
Still to do: Implementing
versioneer