Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments - #923

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test
Jun 24, 2026
Merged

Add python integration test for spontaneous keysend payments#923
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
heyolaniran:feat/python_binding_test

Conversation

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello @tnull x @enigbe x @Camillarhi This commit adds the test_spontaneous_payment method which :

  • sets up two nodes in regtest environment, funds them, and opens channel
  • Arbitrary sends a 2.5M msat keysend with a custom TLV record
  • Asserts PAYMENT_SUCCESSFUL / PAYMENT_RECEIVED events
  • verify payment details Shared helpers (_setup_two_nodes, _fund_nodes, _open_channel_and_wait_ready, _stop_and_cleanup) reduce duplication for future integration

Motivation

The python bindings has not coverage for send_with_custom_tlvs

Run the new test

  • uv run --group dev python -m unittest src.ldk_node.test_ldk_node.TestLdkNode.test_spontaneous_payment -v

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 I see @tnull was un-assigned.
If you'd like another reviewer assignment, please click here.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI is currently not available, so we'll need to wait a bit. One comment for now

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 0a308cb to 8056689CompareJune 8, 2026 18:31
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 11, 2026 21:57
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py Outdated
Comment threadbindings/python/src/ldk_node/test_ldk_node.py
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 8056689 to 3c9be11CompareJune 15, 2026 17:23
@heyolaniran
heyolaniran requested a review from tnullJune 18, 2026 09:42
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now, sorry!

@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

@tnull
tnull self-requested a review June 24, 2026 07:31
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@tnull fine, the conflit is resolved and i notice the CI is back !

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull
tnull removed their request for review June 24, 2026 10:02
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Yes, please rebase now that #947 landed to get CI to pass.

@tnull the branch is up to date and the CI passed successfully.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

Duplicated node setup, funding, channel opening, and teardown logic
made integration tests harder to read and maintain. Hard-coded ports
also risked collisions when tests run in parallel.
Introduce reusable helpers for two-node setup, funding, channel
ready waiting, and cleanup. Bind ephemeral ports to avoid conflicts,
and refactor test_channel_full_cycle to use them without changing
test behavior.
Exercise the spontaneous payment (keysend) path through the Python
UniFFI bindings after a channel is ready. Assert events, custom TLV
records, and persisted payment metadata on both sender and receiver.
@heyolaniran
heyolaniranforce-pushed the feat/python_binding_test branch from 51df0ce to b318ccdCompareJune 24, 2026 13:11
@heyolaniran

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Please cleanup the commit history. It should just be two commits: first the prefactor extracting logic into the helper, then using the helper adding the new test case.

Please also make sure to follow the guidance on https://cbea.ms/git-commit/ for how to format/structure commit messages.

sure. history cleaned @tnull

@tnull
tnull merged commit 8a54260 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2026
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@heyolaniran@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull