Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Switch `ldk-server-client` from `reqwest` to `bitreq` by Anyitechs · Pull Request #127 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq - #127

Draft
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest
Draft

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq#127
Anyitechs wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
Anyitechs:drop-reqwest

Conversation

@Anyitechs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This will switch ldk-server-client from using the reqwest dep to using the ecosystem maintained bitreq crate.

Meanwhile, this will be in draft till rust-bitcoin/corepc#502 hopefully lands and released, so we can bring back ability to load custom root certificates.

Closes#119

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @benthecarman as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@benthecarman
benthecarman self-requested a review February 16, 2026 18:28
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @benthecarman! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarmanbenthecarman left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to hold off until ldk and ldk node have switched over for a clean break

Comment threadldk-server-client/src/client.rs Outdated
LdkServerError::new(InternalError, format!("Failed to read response body: {}", e))
})?;
let status_code = response.status_code;
let is_success_status_code = || -> bool { (200..300).contains(&status_code) };

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this a function?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was trying to mirror the is_success() function from reqwest and maintain a simple check like we were doing before decoding the response.

};

const APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM: &str = "application/octet-stream";
const MAX_CACHED_CONNECTIONS: usize = 10;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc? I feel like this could be a lot lower. Not a huge deal though

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this what they're doing in corepc?

Not sure, but the least recently used connection gets evicted when the cache is full. We can increase it (but not sure what the default is, so it will guide that as the docs didn't mention it)

@benthecarmanbenthecarman mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2026
25 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Switch ldk-server-client from reqwest to bitreq

3 participants

@Anyitechs@ldk-reviews-bot@benthecarman