Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC by benthecarman · Pull Request #175 · lightningdevkit/ldk-server · GitHub
Skip to content

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC - #175

Closed
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc
Closed

Replace REST and RabbitMQ with gRPC#175
benthecarman wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
benthecarman:grpc

Conversation

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Alternative to #168, wanted to quickly see what this would look like

Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.

Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Mar 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎉 This PR is now ready for review!
Please choose at least one reviewer by assigning them on the right bar.
If no reviewers are assigned within 10 minutes, I'll automatically assign one.
Once the first reviewer has submitted a review, a second will be assigned if required.

@benthecarman
benthecarmanforce-pushed the grpc branch 6 times, most recently from c99b7a3 to f176109CompareMarch 26, 2026 18:52
Consolidate the two separate communication protocols (protobuf
over REST via Hyper, and RabbitMQ for events) into a single gRPC
interface using tonic. This eliminates the RabbitMQ operational
dependency and gives clients strongly-typed generated stubs.
Events are now delivered via a server-streaming RPC backed by a
tokio broadcast channel. HMAC auth moves to a tonic interceptor
using timestamp-only signing since TLS guarantees body integrity.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@benthecarman
benthecarman marked this pull request as ready for review March 26, 2026 21:05
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

1 similar comment
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @tnull@joostjager! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@benthecarman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

closing in favor of #176

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@benthecarman@ldk-reviews-bot