Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Upgrade LDK Node - #45

Merged
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Upgrade LDK Node#45
G8XSU merged 10 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
G8XSU:ldk-node-upgrade-for-log

Conversation

@G8XSU

@G8XSUG8XSU commented Feb 19, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Upgrade LDK Node to commit [6de350040e0fc5eb9cfcd15fad3919f5a79b82b9]

@G8XSUG8XSU changed the title WIP: Ldk node upgradeUpgrade LDK NodeFeb 20, 2025
@G8XSU
G8XSU requested a review from arik-soFebruary 20, 2025 23:17
@G8XSU
G8XSU marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2025 23:17
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Is this meant to include all the commits from #44? Because it seems to be doing much more than just increasing the LDK Node version.

@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@arik-so It doesn't include PR-44 commits, these are just the interface changes required to upgrade ldk/ldk-node.

@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch 2 times, most recently from 0c26c06 to 8f64073CompareFebruary 21, 2025 23:15
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Looks fine to me, just adding some context to some of the commits might be a good idea.

LDK Node MSRV has changed to 1.75.0, hence we update
our MSRV as well.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
In PaymentForwarded events, we now have access to prev_node_id
and next_node_id.
Since they are not required for existing logging.
Bolt11 Send API now supports setting description_hash
instead of description, account for this api change in ldk.
Onchain sends now support setting a custom fee-rate,
account for this api change in ldk.
LDK Node now supports logging through log facade and
there are minor associated api changes.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from 8f64073 to b887021CompareFebruary 24, 2025 22:27
@G8XSU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Added.

// The on-chain transaction is confirmed in the best chain.
message Confirmed {
// The hash of the block in which the transaction was confirmed.
string block_hash = 1;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should this be a string? If so, should we point out it's hex, and whether it's big endian? Because bitcoind can make that a pain with their little endian shenanigans

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it should be a string, reasoning: #14

IIUC, hex representation itself isn't endian specific,
since hashes are just sequence of bytes, we directly use the hex representation. (and no endianess involved in seq of bytes.)
it could be called "big-endian" but will mention it only as hex representation.

clarified to indicate hex representation.

Onchain payments now provide additional information such as
transaction_id and confirmation_status.
@G8XSU
G8XSUforce-pushed the ldk-node-upgrade-for-log branch from b887021 to 50f9f6bCompareFebruary 25, 2025 01:06
@G8XSU
G8XSU merged commit cd2a532 into lightningdevkit:mainFeb 25, 2025
rsafier pushed a commit to rsafier/ldk-server that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@G8XSU@arik-so