Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Include short channel id in PaymentPathFailed by jkczyz · Pull Request #1077 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -2888,6 +2888,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed: sessions.get().len() == 0,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: None,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: None,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2945,9 +2946,9 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
match &onion_error {
&HTLCFailReason::LightningError { ref err } => {
#[cfg(test)]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, onion_error_code, onion_error_data) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
#[cfg(not(test))]
let (network_update, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
let (network_update, short_channel_id, payment_retryable, _, _) = onion_utils::process_onion_failure(&self.secp_ctx, &self.logger, &source, err.data.clone());
// TODO: If we decided to blame ourselves (or one of our channels) in
// process_onion_failure we should close that channel as it implies our
// next-hop is needlessly blaming us!
Expand All@@ -2958,6 +2959,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id,
#[cfg(test)]
error_code: onion_error_code,
#[cfg(test)]
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -2985,6 +2987,7 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, M: Deref, T: Deref, K: Deref, F: Deref, L: Deref> ChannelMana
network_update: None,
all_paths_failed,
path: path.clone(),
short_channel_id: Some(path.first().unwrap().short_channel_id),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really a huge fan of "punishing" our own channels - on one hand its nice that the payment goes through, but on the other hand it seems like we're addressing the problem in the wrong way - we have a peer who isn't able to read our HTLC-add messages, we shouldn't just stop sending payments their way, we should close the channel with them and disconnect.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Punishment only occurs during event handling, so this is just signaling which is the responsible channel. The event handler could check if short_channel_id is the same as the first hop in the path and act accordingly. For instance, InvoicePayer could not pass the hop to the scorer in this case. And another event handler (perhaps in BackgroundProcessor?) could close the channel. Thoughts?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense, I suppose.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could make it an enum

OurChannel(u64)
NetworkChannel(u64)
NotRetryable

Just some inspo, I'm fine with it as is

#[cfg(test)]
error_code: Some(*failure_code),
#[cfg(test)]
Expand Down
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -6068,11 +6068,12 @@ fn test_fail_holding_cell_htlc_upon_free() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(our_payment_hash.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -6155,11 +6156,12 @@ fn test_free_and_fail_holding_cell_htlcs() {
let events = nodes[0].node.get_and_clear_pending_events();
assert_eq!(events.len(), 1);
match &events[0] {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref error_code, ref error_data, ref all_paths_failed, path: _ } => {
&Event::PaymentPathFailed { ref payment_hash, ref rejected_by_dest, ref network_update, ref all_paths_failed, path: _, ref short_channel_id, ref error_code, ref error_data } => {
assert_eq!(payment_hash_2.clone(), *payment_hash);
assert_eq!(*rejected_by_dest, false);
assert_eq!(*all_paths_failed, true);
assert_eq!(*network_update, None);
assert_eq!(*short_channel_id, None);
assert_eq!(*error_code, None);
assert_eq!(*error_data, None);
},
Expand Down
Loading