Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests - #1113

Closed
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro
Closed

Use common macro and local channel view for routing in tests#1113
TheBlueMatt wants to merge 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2021-10-test-routing-via-macro

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.

This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch 2 times, most recently from 6a54860 to 655cca1CompareOctober 9, 2021 17:43
@codecov

codecovBot commented Oct 9, 2021

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #1113 (41ca433) into main (5a356ca) will decrease coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1113 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.67% 90.60% -0.07% 
==========================================
Files 66 66 Lines 34689 34515 -174 ==========================================
- Hits 31454 31274 -180 - Misses 3235 3241 +6 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs97.69% <100.00%> (-0.09%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.34% <100.00%> (-0.13%)⬇️
lightning-background-processor/src/lib.rs93.75% <0.00%> (-0.49%)⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5a356ca...41ca433. Read the comment docs.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 655cca1 to b3fd1f8CompareOctober 9, 2021 20:17

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Now based on #1116 to avoid conflicting too much with ongoing work.

This moves towards standardizing the get_route calls somewhat in
tests to avoid the huge "change every line of tests to a new
get_route API" commits in the future.
This isn't meant to be exhaustive, and only tackled the very
trivial cases, but progress is progress.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2021-10-test-routing-via-macro branch from 1ebbf9b to 41ca433CompareOctober 12, 2021 18:30
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Gonna wait and see what happens with #1120 first.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

#1120 was basically a better version of this and landed.

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace