Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Onion messages: add fuzz testing by valentinewallace · Pull Request #1648 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Onion messages: add fuzz testing - #1648

Merged
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs
Aug 17, 2022
Merged

Onion messages: add fuzz testing #1648
valentinewallace merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-08-fuzz-onion-msgs

Conversation

@valentinewallace

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace commented Aug 3, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds fuzz testing for onion messages.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Test LGTM, giving this some CPU cycles now.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hmmm, I gave this a few weeks of CPU time and it wasn't able to find its way into a valid onion message decryption at all. This tells me we need to seed the fuzzer, like the way we do full_stack_target, at least, if not find a way to simplify the target here. I'm not sure quite how to simplify the target greatly, though, so maybe just seed it and move on.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Specifically, the fuzzer did not fail with this patch:

diff --git a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
index 7eba3cdd..617ed434 100644
--- a/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
+++ b/lightning/src/onion_message/messenger.rs
@@ -211,11 +211,13 @@ impl<Signer: Sign, K: Deref, L: Deref> OnionMessenger<Signer, K, L>
Ok((Payload::Receive {
control_tlvs: ReceiveControlTlvs::Unblinded(ReceiveTlvs { path_id })
}, None)) => {
+panic!("1");
log_info!(self.logger, "Received an onion message with path_id: {:02x?}", path_id);
},
Ok((Payload::Forward(ForwardControlTlvs::Unblinded(ForwardTlvs {
next_node_id, next_blinding_override
})), Some((next_hop_hmac, new_packet_bytes)))) => {
+panic!("2");
// TODO: we need to check whether `next_node_id` is our node, in which case this is a dummy
// blinded hop and this onion message is destined for us. In this situation, we should keep
// unwrapping the onion layers to get to the final payload. Since we don't have the option

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I added some seeding but could add more onion message seeds if it helps.

Unsure if it would be good to add msg_targets for onion_message::Payload and/or BlindedRoute?

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Able to hit the obvious panics now. I put the seeds in test_no_onion_message_breakage -- not sure if they should be checked into git as well?

Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/chacha20poly1305rfc.rs
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Aug 15, 2022
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs Outdated
Comment threadfuzz/src/onion_message.rs
Also update the fuzz ChaCha20Poly1305 to not mark as finished after a single
encrypt_in_place. This is because more bytes may still need to be encrypted,
causing us to panic at the assertion that finished == false when we go to
encrypt more.
Also fix unused_mut warning in messenger + add log on OM forward for testing
@valentinewallace
valentinewallace merged commit 558c460 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 17, 2022
@jkczyzjkczyz mentioned this pull request May 10, 2023
60 tasks
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@valentinewallace@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino