Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices - #1728

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs
Sep 19, 2022
Merged

Swap Vec<&RouteHop> parameters for slices#1728
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2022-09-slices-not-vecs

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating methods were added to the Router object, however they were passed as a Vec of references. We use the list-of-references pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a Vec over a slice, given the Vec doesn't hold ownership of the objects anyway.

We also add a second commit which replaces an Option<&u64> with an Option<u64>.

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Sep 18, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.71% // Decreases project coverage by -0.01%⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (85eb1fd) compared to base (dc28f9b).
Patch coverage: 30.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1728 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.73% 90.71% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 86 86 Lines 46675 46679 +4 Branches 46675 46679 +4 ==========================================
- Hits 42350 42345 -5 - Misses 4325 4334 +9 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs94.85% <0.00%> (ø)
lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs89.85% <40.90%> (-0.27%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/monitor_tests.rs99.44% <0.00%> (-0.12%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs96.99% <0.00%> (-0.08%)⬇️
lightning/src/util/events.rs38.40% <0.00%> (+0.26%)⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2022
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/payment.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning-invoice/src/utils.rs Outdated

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, mod above feedback.

In c353c3e, new scorer-updating
methods were added to the `Router` object, however they were
passed as a `Vec` of references. We use the list-of-references
pattern to make bindings simpler (by not requiring allocations per
entry), however there's no reason prefer to passing a `Vec` over
a slice, given the `Vec` doesn't hold ownership of the objects
anyway.
In c353c3e an accessor method was
added which returns an `Option<&u64>`. While this allows Rust to
return an 8-byte object, returning a reference to something
pointer-sized is a somewhat strange API.
Instead, we opt for a straight `Option<u64>`, which is sadly
somewhat larger on the stack, but is simpler and already supported
in the bindings generation.
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Dropped the excess ampersands and went ahead and squashed since its super trivial:

$ git diff-tree -U1 6d6b9cc4 85eb1fde
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs
index 5af6cb766..3b4fe7092 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/payment.rs@@ -1847,3 +1847,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -1851,3 +1851,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -1855,3 +1855,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -1859,3 +1859,3 @@ mod tests {
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
diff --git a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
index 8c96edbb0..5faecbfab 100644
--- a/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs+++ b/lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs@@ -486,3 +486,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}
@@ -490,3 +490,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_path_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().payment_path_successful(path);
}
@@ -494,3 +494,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_successful(&self, path: &[&RouteHop]) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(&path);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_successful(path);
}
@@ -498,3 +498,3 @@ impl<G: Deref<Target = NetworkGraph<L>>, L: Deref, S: Deref> Router for DefaultR
fn notify_payment_probe_failed(&self, path: &[&RouteHop], short_channel_id: u64) {
- self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(&path, short_channel_id);+ self.scorer.lock().probe_failed(path, short_channel_id);
}

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit 18ac915 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 19, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@codecov-commenter@tnull@jkczyz