HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups - #1893

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

HTLC JIT channel interception followup + minor cleanups#1893
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2022-12-jit-forwards-followup

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closes#1890.

Because the changes were pretty trivial, I stuck on two minor commits that help prepare for moving payment retries.

ChannelUnavailable is a better fit for errors regarding unavailable channels
than APIMisuseError.
Also log bytes in errors as hex instead of decimal.
Soon we're going to need to return an error when ChannelManager is unable to
find a route, so we'll need a way to distinguish between that and the user
supplying an invalid route.
@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Not sure which follow-ups we'd like to include here, but just leaving another follow-up that I thought of that might be worth considering:

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.
The only mention we have currently is under the accept_intercept_htlcs config flag:
/// Setting this to true may break backwards compatibility with LDK versions < 0.0.113.

I think it would be good to add some docs to get_intercept_scid that informs the user that they will break backwards compatibility once they generate an intercept scid that's forwarded over with accept_intercept_htlcs set to true.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

@ViktorT-11

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I realized after the PR was merged, that I don't think we communicate well enough to the user that using the Intercept feature will break backwards compatibility.

Let's add a release note for it. I'm not sure we need to litter it all over our docs.

Ah yeah, sounds good. Didn't think about that :)!

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@valentinewallace can you add pending release notes like @ViktorTigerstrom suggests in another followup? Thanks.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 52edb35 into lightningdevkit:mainDec 1, 2022
@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

#1835 followups

3 participants

@valentinewallace@ViktorT-11@TheBlueMatt