Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); Remove KeysInterface by arik-so · Pull Request #1930 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove KeysInterface - #1930

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface
Jan 14, 2023
Merged

Remove KeysInterface#1930
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
arik-so:2022-12-remove-keysinterface

Conversation

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 2 times, most recently from c8fd161 to 74a5712CompareDecember 21, 2022 00:48
@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Dec 21, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Base: 90.73% // Head: 90.76% // Increases project coverage by +0.02% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (22d7a0b) compared to base (5221e4a).
Patch coverage: 97.60% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 22d7a0b differs from pull request most recent head 49c1f30. Consider uploading reports for the commit 49c1f30 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #1930 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.73% 90.76% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 97 96 -1 Lines 50539 50088 -451 Branches 50539 50088 -451 ==========================================
- Hits 45859 45461 -398 + Misses 4680 4627 -53 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning-block-sync/src/init.rs91.11% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/keysinterface.rs83.78% <ø> (-0.04%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs93.56% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/onion_route_tests.rs97.64% <ø> (-0.01%)⬇️
lightning/src/ln/payment_tests.rs98.73% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️
lightning/src/ln/peer_handler.rs55.82% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/priv_short_conf_tests.rs96.54% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/reorg_tests.rs100.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/shutdown_tests.rs96.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/routing/router.rs90.90% <ø> (+0.03%)⬆️
... and 53 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@arik-soarik-so changed the title WIP: Remove KeysInterfaceRemove KeysInterfaceDec 21, 2022
@arik-so
arik-so marked this pull request as ready for review December 21, 2022 03:37
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/util/persist.rs Outdated
CW::Target: 'static + chain::Watch<<K::Target as SignerProvider>::Signer>,
T::Target: 'static + BroadcasterInterface,
K::Target: 'static + KeysInterface,
K::Target: 'static + EntropySource + NodeSigner + SignerProvider,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I imagine we can probably start to split each of these out into their own generic constraint (yay more generics). EntropySource seems like a good candidate since it's somewhat standalone. NodeSigner and SignerProvider really depends on the underlying deployment, since they will likely be backed by the same HSM/secure element.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, if we're splitting the traits I have to assume we expect people to have different structs that implement different parts of the traits (otherwise why are we doing this to begin with :) ), in which case we need to break up the generics as well.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree we should split things up, but I would lean against doing all the splitting in this PR, maybe with the exception of some very shallow-level API examples, like BackgroundProcessor. BackgroundProcessor definitely lacks generics.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it will be less effort to do it in one PR? As-is is just more diff and intermediate state, it would be less total diff to review doing it all at once.

@arik-soarik-soDec 22, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, one benefit of splitting it up into two is that it would allow @wpaulino to open his node_secret removal PR against the commit that's currently in this one, while I work on the follow-up in parallel. But I'll work on the parameter split tonight; maybe I can get it in fast enough and it's less trouble than I'm anticipating.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that would conflict, now that we split the traits and moved those functions around. This PR doesn't really heavily touch the keysinterface.rs file.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/inbound_payment.rs Outdated
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Wilmer just made the point that instead of removing KeysInterface entirely, we could simply make it be comprised of NodeSigner and SignerProvider, removing its EntropySource component.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'm still not sure why its worth doing that as a separate PR, but, sure, if you want to do that to make forward progress, sounds fine. We'll ultimately need to do it for all of them anyway.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch 6 times, most recently from eafdaa2 to 22d7a0bCompareDecember 25, 2022 19:51
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This commit separation makes the PR really hard to review (ie generates more total lines of diff to look at) - can you instead break it up as individual commits which change different structs to use individual traits (including the lifetime changes) and then only as the very last commit remove the (at that point unused) KeysInterface trait? That should lead to a series of relatively small commits.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'll try

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needs rebase after #1812, sorry. Should be mechanical but may be a bit annoying.

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

There are only like two files that are letting their KeysInterface arguments be split up atomically, inbound_payment.rs and blinded_path.rs. Everything else percolates down to the Channel and ChannelManager struct, resulting in an all-or-nothing scenario.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can't OnionMessenger go separately as well? Also probably ChannelMonitor, no?

@arik-so

arik-so commented Jan 12, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Funny you say that, because those two are exactly the types I've been trying to make separate. But no, they both have dependency chains that suck in all of Channel and ChannelManager.

@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from 22d7a0b to a65fa82CompareJanuary 12, 2023 23:58
@arik-so
arik-soforce-pushed the 2022-12-remove-keysinterface branch from a65fa82 to 49c1f30CompareJanuary 13, 2023 00:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

If you remove the KeysInterface last, rather than first, I think it should work? Which dependency chain are you referring to?

@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

I'm talking about splitting up the keys_interface argument into implementations of its comprising traits. Once you have two or three arguments of different traits, that dependency chain sneaks through pretty much everything. That is unrelated to removing KeysInterface.

pub chain_monitor: &'b test_utils::TestChainMonitor<'c>,
pub keys_manager: &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,
pub node: &'a ChannelManager<&'b TestChainMonitor<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestBroadcaster, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'b test_utils::TestKeysInterface, &'c test_utils::TestFeeEstimator, &'b test_utils::TestRouter<'c>, &'c test_utils::TestLogger>,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-existing, but we really need a type alias for this test ChannelManager...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true that

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit ac6e0b3 into lightningdevkit:mainJan 14, 2023
PXplod pushed a commit to bitlightlabs/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
0.0.114 - Mar 3, 2023 - "Faster Async BOLT12 Retries"
API Updates
===========
* `InvoicePayer` has been removed and its features moved directly into
`ChannelManager`. As such it now requires a simplified `Router` and supports
`send_payment_with_retry` (and friends). `ChannelManager::retry_payment` was
removed in favor of the automated retries. Invoice payment utilities in
`lightning-invoice` now call the new code (lightningdevkit#1812, lightningdevkit#1916, lightningdevkit#1929, lightningdevkit#2007, etc).
* `Sign`/`BaseSign` has been renamed `ChannelSigner`, with `EcdsaChannelSigner`
split out in anticipation of future schnorr/taproot support (lightningdevkit#1967).
* The catch-all `KeysInterface` was split into `EntropySource`, `NodeSigner`,
and `SignerProvider`. `KeysManager` implements all three (lightningdevkit#1910, lightningdevkit#1930).
* `KeysInterface::get_node_secret` is now `KeysManager::get_node_secret_key`
and is no longer required for external signers (lightningdevkit#1951, lightningdevkit#2070).
* A `lightning-transaction-sync` crate has been added which implements keeping
LDK in sync with the chain via an esplora server (lightningdevkit#1870). Note that it can
only be used on nodes that *never* ran a previous version of LDK.
* `Score` is updated in `BackgroundProcessor` instead of via `Router` (lightningdevkit#1996).
* `ChainAccess::get_utxo` (now `UtxoAccess`) can now be resolved async (lightningdevkit#1980).
* BOLT12 `Offer`, `InvoiceRequest`, `Invoice` and `Refund` structs as well as
associated builders have been added. Such invoices cannot yet be paid due to
missing support for blinded path payments (lightningdevkit#1927, lightningdevkit#1908, lightningdevkit#1926).
* A `lightning-custom-message` crate has been added to make combining multiple
custom messages into one enum/handler easier (lightningdevkit#1832).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailure` is now generated for failure to send an HTLC
over the first hop on our local channel (lightningdevkit#2014, lightningdevkit#2043).
* `lightning-net-tokio` no longer requires an `Arc` on `PeerManager` (lightningdevkit#1968).
* `ChannelManager::list_recent_payments` was added (lightningdevkit#1873).
* `lightning-background-processor` `std` is now optional in async mode (lightningdevkit#1962).
* `create_phantom_invoice` can now be used in `no-std` (lightningdevkit#1985).
* The required final CLTV delta on inbound payments is now configurable (lightningdevkit#1878)
* bitcoind RPC error code and message are now surfaced in `block-sync` (lightningdevkit#2057).
* Get `historical_estimated_channel_liquidity_probabilities` was added (lightningdevkit#1961).
* `ChannelManager::fail_htlc_backwards_with_reason` was added (lightningdevkit#1948).
* Macros which implement serialization using TLVs or straight writing of struct
fields are now public (lightningdevkit#1823, lightningdevkit#1976, lightningdevkit#1977).
Backwards Compatibility
=======================
* Any inbound payments with a custom final CLTV delta will be rejected by LDK
if you downgrade prior to receipt (lightningdevkit#1878).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::network_update` will always be `None` if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK (lightningdevkit#2043).
* `Event::PaymentPathFailed::all_paths_removed` will always be false if an
0.0.114-generated event is read by a prior version of LDK. Users who rely on
it to determine payment retries should migrate to `Event::PaymentFailed`, in
a separate release prior to upgrading to LDK 0.0.114 if downgrading is
supported (lightningdevkit#2043).
Performance Improvements
========================
* Channel data is now stored per-peer and channel updates across multiple
peers can be operated on simultaneously (lightningdevkit#1507).
* Routefinding is roughly 1.5x faster (lightningdevkit#1799).
* Deserializing a `NetworkGraph` is roughly 6x faster (lightningdevkit#2016).
* Memory usage for a `NetworkGraph` has been reduced substantially (lightningdevkit#2040).
* `KeysInterface::get_secure_random_bytes` is roughly 200x faster (lightningdevkit#1974).
Bug Fixes
=========
* Fixed a bug where a delay in processing a `PaymentSent` event longer than the
time taken to persist a `ChannelMonitor` update, when occurring immediately
prior to a crash, may result in the `PaymentSent` event being lost (lightningdevkit#2048).
* Fixed spurious rejections of rapid gossip sync data when the graph has been
updated by other means between gossip syncs (lightningdevkit#2046).
* Fixed a panic in `KeysManager` when the high bit of `starting_time_nanos`
is set (lightningdevkit#1935).
* Resolved an issue where the `ChannelManager::get_persistable_update_future`
future would fail to wake until a second notification occurs (lightningdevkit#2064).
* Resolved a memory leak when using `ChannelManager::send_probe` (lightningdevkit#2037).
* Fixed a deadlock on some platforms at least when using async `ChannelMonitor`
updating (lightningdevkit#2006).
* Removed debug-only assertions which were reachable in threaded code (lightningdevkit#1964).
* In some cases when payment sending fails on our local channel retries no
longer take the same path and thus never succeed (lightningdevkit#2014).
* Retries for spontaneous payments have been fixed (lightningdevkit#2002).
* Return an `Err` if `lightning-persister` fails to read the directory listing
rather than panicing (lightningdevkit#1943).
* `peer_disconnected` will now never be called without `peer_connected` (lightningdevkit#2035)
Security
========
0.0.114 fixes several denial-of-service vulnerabilities which are reachable from
untrusted input from channel counterparties or in deployments accepting inbound
connections or channels. It also fixes a denial-of-service vulnerability in rare
cases in the route finding logic.
* The number of pending un-funded channels as well as peers without funded
channels is now limited to avoid denial of service (lightningdevkit#1988).
* A second `channel_ready` message received immediately after the first could
lead to a spurious panic (lightningdevkit#2071). This issue was introduced with 0conf
support in LDK 0.0.107.
* A division-by-zero issue was fixed in the `ProbabilisticScorer` if the amount
being sent (including previous-hop fees) is equal to a channel's capacity
while walking the graph (lightningdevkit#2072). The division-by-zero was introduced with
historical data tracking in LDK 0.0.112.
In total, this release features 130 files changed, 21457 insertions, 10113
deletions in 343 commits from 18 authors, in alphabetical order:
* Alec Chen
* Allan Douglas R. de Oliveira
* Andrei
* Arik Sosman
* Daniel Granhão
* Duncan Dean
* Elias Rohrer
* Jeffrey Czyz
* John Cantrell
* Kurtsley
* Matt Corallo
* Max Fang
* Omer Yacine
* Valentine Wallace
* Viktor Tigerström
* Wilmer Paulino
* benthecarman
* jurvis
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
carlaKC added a commit to carlaKC/rust-lightning that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
KeysInterface was split into EntropySource, SignerProvider and
NodeSigner in lightningdevkit#1930.
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@arik-so@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@wpaulino