Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix and test in-flight HTLC scoring in between retries - #2020
Conversation
ec20301 to
70f2873CompareCodecov ReportBase: 87.33% // Head: 87.31% // Decreases project coverage by
📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2020 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.33% 87.31% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 100 100 Lines 44160 44168 +8 Branches 44160 44168 +8 ==========================================
- Hits 38568 38566 -2 - Misses 5592 5602 +10
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
TheBlueMatt
commented
Feb 7, 2023
Ah the ancient proverbs strike agian. Needs rebase already lol. Basically LGTM tho, but no-std is sad. |
0db65a2 to
6ddf6baComparevalentinewallace
commented
Feb 9, 2023
Tacked on a small commit to remove unnecessary (as of #1996) |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
TheBlueMatt
commented
Feb 13, 2023
Needs rebase :( |
406b908 to
61ec630Comparevalentinewallace
commented
Feb 13, 2023
Rebased |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
61ec630 to
3ddb8ffCompareUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This allows us set scoring expectations and ensure in-flight htlcs are factored into scoring
3ddb8ff to
2b2965fCompareTheBlueMatt
commented
Feb 14, 2023
Note that this only actually tests the |
TheBlueMatt
commented
Feb 14, 2023
CI failure is #2032, will need to kick it after other jobs complete, nbd. |
Turns out that untested code really is broken code.
I think we don't need to do something similar for the
first_hopsbecause retries know what scids failed previously. That doesn't cover all cases, but on the other hand it saves a vec allocation to not recompute first hops and should be rare, so I think it's good enough(?).Partially addresses #1932.