Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually by wpaulino · Pull Request #2368 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually - #2368

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance
Jun 24, 2023
Merged

Require inbound channels with anchor outputs to be accepted manually#2368
TheBlueMatt merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such channels be manually accepted.

Depends on #2361 and #2367.

@wpaulinowpaulino added this to the 0.0.116 milestone Jun 20, 2023
@wpaulinowpaulino mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2023
10 tasks
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from 2329307 to ed14d0eCompareJune 23, 2023 19:40
Comment threadlightning/src/util/config.rs
Now that all of the core functionality for anchor outputs has landed,
we're ready to remove the config flag that was temporarily hiding it
from our API.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch from ed14d0e to dece81eCompareJune 23, 2023 21:27
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 23, 2023
Since the use of channels with anchor outputs requires a reserve of
onchain funds to handle channel force closures, it would be
irresponsible to allow a node to accept inbound channel without first
consulting such reserves. To allow users to do so, we require such
channels be manually accepted.
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 92.85% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (3973865) 90.30% compared to head (e6348b8) 90.31%.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #2368 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.30% 90.31% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 106 106 Lines 54900 54948 +48 Branches 54900 54948 +48 ==========================================
+ Hits 49576 49628 +52 + Misses 5324 5320 -4 
Impacted FilesCoverage Δ
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs94.50% <ø> (-0.10%)⬇️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs94.72% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/package.rs91.43% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/bump_transaction.rs41.55% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/events/mod.rs41.86% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/ln/chan_utils.rs94.51% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/sign/mod.rs84.38% <ø> (+0.02%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/config.rs58.13% <ø> (+0.66%)⬆️
lightning/src/util/enforcing_trait_impls.rs88.00% <ø> (ø)
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs93.06% <83.33%> (+0.34%)⬆️
... and 4 more

... and 4 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed TheBlueMatt’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:26

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
assert_eq!(open_channel_msg.temporary_channel_id, create_chan_id);
assert_eq!(node_a.node.list_channels().iter().find(|channel| channel.channel_id == create_chan_id).unwrap().user_channel_id, 42);
node_b.node.handle_open_channel(&node_a.node.get_our_node_id(), &open_channel_msg);
if node_b.node.get_current_default_configuration().manually_accept_inbound_channels {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I was going to need this anyway for V2 establishment :)

#[test]
fn test_inbound_anchors_manual_acceptance() {
// Tests that we properly limit inbound channels when we have the manual-channel-acceptance
// flag set and (sometimes) accept channels as 0conf.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What conditions correspond with “sometimes” here?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I copied another test as a template but forgot to update the comment here. Will fix in a future PR.

@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed dunxen’s stale reviewJune 24, 2023 15:36

The merge-base changed after approval.

dunxen
dunxen previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt previously approved these changes Jun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from TheBlueMatt and dunxenJune 24, 2023 15:42

The merge-base changed after approval.

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Oh joy github is broken.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit d327c23 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 24, 2023
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the inbound-anchors-manual-acceptance branch June 24, 2023 17:24
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@codecov-commenter@TheBlueMatt@dunxen