Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups - #3250

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup
Aug 21, 2024
Merged

Misc (mostly-)feature cleanups#3250
TheBlueMatt merged 5 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2024-08-feature-cleanup

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Built on #3249, random stuff I came across while writing that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 468d088 to d27e098CompareAugust 17, 2024 22:25
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.93939% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.81%. Comparing base (bbfa15e) to head (11ab302).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

FilesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/onion_message/functional_tests.rs50.00%2 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs94.73%1 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/outbound_payment.rs75.00%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3250 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.82% 89.81% -0.01% 
==========================================
Files 125 125 Lines 102867 102798 -69 Branches 102867 102798 -69 ==========================================
- Hits 92398 92327 -71 - Misses 7753 7756 +3 + Partials 2716 2715 -1 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from d27e098 to 5b615feCompareAugust 18, 2024 15:35
@arik-so

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Needs a rebase.

In 81389de we removed a note about
mixing the `std` and `no-std` feature when de/serializing
`ProbabilisticScorer`s but forgot to note that there was a second
copy of that note in the module documentation.
This removes that note.
To handle `std` and `no-std` concepts of time in scoring, we'd
originally written a generic `Time` trait which we could use to
fetch the current time, observe real (not wall-clock) elapsed time,
and serialize the time.
Eventually, scoring stopped using this `Time` trait but outbound
payment retry expiry started using it instead to mock time in
tests.
Since scoring no longer uses the full features which required the
`Time` trait, we can substantially simplify by just having the
mocking option.
Not sure why we ever really had this, no one really ever bounds
anything on `std::Error` and its kinda a dead type, so there's no
need for us to `impl` it for our types.
Fewer feature flags makes for more readable code, so we opt for
that over very marginally more effecient code here.
We never actually build with `#![no_std]` in tests as Rust does
not support it. Thus, many tests have spurious `std` feature gates
when they run just fine without them. Here we remove those gates,
though note that tests that depend on behavior elsewhere in the
codebase which is `std`-gated obviously need to retain their
feature gates.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2024-08-feature-cleanup branch from 5b615fe to 11ab302CompareAugust 21, 2024 14:11
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Rebased.

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love to see it
Screenshot 2024-08-21 at 11 38 24 AM

#[cfg(feature = "std")]
/// Returns true when a full routing table sync should be performed with a peer.
fn should_request_full_sync(&self, _node_id: &PublicKey) -> bool {
//TODO: Determine whether to request a full sync based on the network map.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to remove this todo?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, I don't think we will/can ever make such a decision - instead we need the spec to include a set reconciliation protocol.

Comment on lines +618 to +619
#[allow(unused)]
let should_sync = self.should_request_full_sync();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: I don't see why this got moved and allow(unused)'d?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the std bounds on should_request_full_sync, and in order to make it not-unused, I moved this out of the std block below. But that also means that in no-std builds this value is unused. In theory we should keep the bounds as they were, but I liked the diff stats 😅

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, I had a similar issue once. Hate this aspect of conditional compilation

@arik-soarik-so left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with the same questions that @valentinewallace raised.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 3111508 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 21, 2024
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@arik-so@valentinewallace