Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
`rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); `rustfmt`: Run on the `routing` directory (2/3) by tnull · Pull Request #3337 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3) - #3337

Closed
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2
Closed

rustfmt: Run on the routing directory (2/3)#3337
tnull wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
tnull:2024-09-rustfmt-router-2

Conversation

@tnull

@tnulltnull commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Based on #3336.

This is PR 2/3, just formatting router.rs.

Followups: #3338.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Sep 24, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (053281f) to head (947cf72).
Report is 1330 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3337 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.66% 89.77% +0.11% 
==========================================
Files 126 126 Lines 103226 105591 +2365 Branches 103226 105591 +2365 ==========================================
+ Hits 92555 94796 +2241 - Misses 7954 8089 +135 + Partials 2717 2706 -11 
FlagCoverage Δ
89.77% <ø> (+0.11%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tnull
tnullforce-pushed the 2024-09-rustfmt-router-2 branch from 01e58df to 947cf72CompareSeptember 25, 2024 04:22
@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased on main after #3336 landed.

@vincenzopalazzovincenzopalazzo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familiar with mutation Ci waorkflow but looks like that the failure is unrelated? https://github.com/lightningdevkit/rust-lightning/actions/runs/11026258813/job/30622498871?pr=3337

otherwise LGMT

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't read it all the way through, mind rebasing and reading it through to fix any small stuff that needs cleanup?

fee_proportional_millionths: 0,
excess_data: Vec::new()
});
update_channel(

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind going through these and pulling the update out into a variable to skip the extra 4 or five lines?

default_node_features().le_flags()
); // We dont pass flags in from invoices yet
assert_eq!(route.paths[0].hops[4].channel_features.le_flags(), &Vec::<u8>::new());
// We can't learn any flags from invoices, sadly

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this got moved

@tnull

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Closing in favor of doing fn-level rustfmt::skip first.

@tnulltnull closed this Jun 11, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tnull@TheBlueMatt@vincenzopalazzo@joostjager