Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager by wpaulino · Pull Request #3554 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager - #3554

Merged
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Start tracking ChannelMonitors by channel ID in ChainMonitor and ChannelManager#3554
wpaulino merged 3 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:channel-monitor-by-channel-id

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify ChannelMonitors with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID, which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.

In the ChainMonitor, we replace the use of funding outpoints as the key to the monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.

In the ChannelManager, in-flight monitor updates are persisted, so we still need to track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in them as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs, and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop the old TLV.


Looking to get concept ACKs on whether we want to go down this path. The first two commits can be considered today, but the last one will have to wait a few releases due to the backwards compatibility concern. Note that this PR does not represent all of the work to achieve our goal, there's still a good bit of refactoring/cleanup to follow.

@wpaulinowpaulino added the weekly goal Someone wants to land this this week label Jan 21, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch 2 times, most recently from 40aeb66 to 1c7a0a1CompareJanuary 21, 2025 21:04
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jan 21, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.41414% with 34 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.49%. Comparing base (569f906) to head (717db82).
Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs72.97%18 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs89.70%6 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs64.28%5 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/chanmon_update_fail_tests.rs98.41%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/functional_tests.rs97.05%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3554 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 88.54% 88.49% -0.05% 
==========================================
Files 149 149 Lines 114459 114709 +250 Branches 114459 114709 +250 ==========================================
+ Hits 101345 101517 +172 - Misses 10618 10691 +73 - Partials 2496 2501 +5 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Concept ACK

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/mod.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI Still unhappy initializing ChannelManagerReadArgs in the fuzz test.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 850ec1b to a24d821CompareJanuary 23, 2025 23:33

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Conceptually LGTM, I think the first two commits make sense, yea. The last commit will obviously have to wait a release or two.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from a24d821 to 5bcca97CompareJanuary 28, 2025 18:22
@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased due to conflicts and removed the last commit

@jkczyzjkczyz left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch from 5bcca97 to c680c0fCompareJanuary 29, 2025 21:40
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jan 29, 2025

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On real comment, a few nits.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/chainmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Once dual funding/splicing is supported, channels will no longer
maintain their original funding outpoint. Ideally, we identify
`ChannelMonitor`s with a stable identifier, such as the channel ID,
which is fixed throughout the channel's lifetime.
This commit replaces the use of funding outpoints as the key to the
monitor index with the channel ID. Note that this is strictly done to
the in-memory state; it does not change how we track monitors within
their persisted state, they are still keyed by their funding outpoint
there. Addressing that is left for follow-up work.
As motivated by the previous commit, we do some of the same work here at
the `ChannelManager` level instead. Unfortunately, we still need to
track the funding outpoint to support downgrades by writing the in
flight monitor updates as two separate TLVs, one using the channel IDs,
and the other using the funding outpoints. Once we are willing to stop
supporting downgrades past this version, we can fully drop it.
It's not needed except for one place where we can just access the field
directly, so we can avoid the allocation on each call. For API
consumers, they may still access the funding script via
`ChannelMonitor::get_funding_script`.
@wpaulino
wpaulino merged commit 9b66e2c into lightningdevkit:mainJan 31, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the channel-monitor-by-channel-id branch January 31, 2025 23:41
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

weekly goalSomeone wants to land this this week

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@wpaulino@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz