fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing by martinsaposnic · Pull Request #3849 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-12T14:43:16Z

Fixes#3515

The fuzz test tests the LiquidityManager's ability to parse and handle arbitrary LSPS message data safely.

ldk-reviews-bot · 2025-06-12T14:43:20Z

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

TheBlueMatt

One comment, otherwise lgtm

TheBlueMatt · 2025-06-12T20:12:22Z

+	let msg_router =
+ Arc::new(DefaultMessageRouter::new(network_graph.clone(), Arc::clone(&keys_manager)));
+	let chain_source = Arc::new(TestChainSource::new(Network::Bitcoin));
+	let kv_store = Arc::new(FilesystemStore::new("persister".into()));


Can we use a test persister rather than something that could write to the fs in a fuzz target?

I guess we should just be able to use the in-memory lightning::util::test_utils::TestStore for this?

tnull

LGTM, mod one nit and the pending question regarding the KVStore.

Great start for lightning-liquidity fuzzing!

tnull · 2025-06-13T07:45:01Z

+	let seed = sha256::Hash::hash(b"lsps-message-seed").to_byte_array();
+	let keys_manager = Arc::new(KeysManager::new(&seed, now.as_secs(), now.subsec_nanos()));
+	let router = Arc::new(DefaultRouter::new(
+ network_graph.clone(),


nit: Given we're about to enable a lint enforcing to use Arc::clone vs. arc.clone() in #3851, let's switch all of these to Arc::clone pls.

codecov · 2025-06-13T21:55:00Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.90%. Comparing base (3ff0350) to head (039af53).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3849 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.89% 89.90% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 164 164 Lines 132022 132022 Branches 132022 132022 ==========================================
+ Hits 118681 118695 +14 + Misses 10649 10640 -9 + Partials 2692 2687 -5

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

tnull

LGTM, feel free to squash, I think.

martinsaposnic · 2025-06-16T14:40:57Z

thanks for the review! squashed and pushed

tnull

LGTM

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

ldk-reviews-bot requested a review from jkczyz June 12, 2025 14:53

tnull requested review from tnull and removed request for jkczyz June 12, 2025 18:48

TheBlueMatt reviewed Jun 12, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes

tnull reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

fuzz: Add LSPS message decoder fuzzing
039af53

martinsaposnic force-pushed the fuzz-testing-lsps branch from d8176d1 to 039af53Compare June 16, 2025 14:40

martinsaposnic requested review from TheBlueMatt and tnull June 16, 2025 14:41

tnull approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes

TheBlueMatt merged commit f3847db into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025

Uh oh!

Conversation

martinsaposnic commented Jun 12, 2025

Uh oh!

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecovBot commented Jun 13, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

martinsaposnic commented Jun 16, 2025

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

martinsaposnic commented Jun 12, 2025

Uh oh!

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

TheBlueMatt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codecovBot commented Jun 13, 2025• edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

martinsaposnic commented Jun 16, 2025

Uh oh!

tnull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

Uh oh!

Conversation

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025•
edited
Loading

codecovBot commented Jun 13, 2025•
edited
Loading

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025•
edited
Loading

codecovBot commented Jun 13, 2025•
edited
Loading

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025•
edited
Loading

codecovBot commented Jun 13, 2025•
edited
Loading

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025•
edited
Loading