Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); Remove low-hanging fruit `rustfmt::skips` in ChannelManager pt. 2 by valentinewallace · Pull Request #3850 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2 - #3850

Merged
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

Remove low-hanging fruit rustfmt::skips in ChannelManager pt. 2#3850
tnull merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
valentinewallace:2025-06-fmt-chanmgr-even-more

Conversation

@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After #3767 landed, there were a bunch of rustfmt::skips added to ChannelManager that could easily be removed.

Here we pick some of that low-hanging fruit by removing the skips for methods that are less than ~10 lines long.

Follows on from #3844, since that one landed so easily.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @joostjager as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.02990% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.93%. Comparing base (3333b6d) to head (a27c1cb).
Report is 23 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs91.02%22 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3850 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.94% 89.93% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 163 163 Lines 131655 131826 +171 Branches 131655 131826 +171 ==========================================
+ Hits 118421 118556 +135 - Misses 10550 10582 +32 - Partials 2684 2688 +4 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Checked the fmt fixes, LGTM. But still I think we have to be super careful with these "random" refactorings outside the context of a functional PR. Maybe it is okay to not touch it also...

best_block_height,
&self.logger,
&self.pending_events,
|args| self.send_payment_along_path(args),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty vertical, but also fairly static code, and probably not so easy to refactor.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
joostjager
joostjager previously approved these changes Jun 12, 2025

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs a rebase now.

rustfmt::skips were added recently all over channelmanager in order for
formatting to be enforced for all new code added to the file.
Here we remove a bunch of those skips that aren't necessary because the
methods that are skipped are so short.
Does not include cfg(splicing) code.
Here we just remove the rustfmt skips, in the next commit we'll clean up the
code that rustfmt made too vertical.
In the previous commit we formatted a bunch of short methods. Here we clean up
the default formatting that rustfmt applied by extracting code into variables.
@valentinewallace

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased

@joostjagerjoostjager left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do feel the urge to again emphasize that we need to be so careful with "random" refactoring. Especially if we only save a couple of lines compared to naive rustfmt. It doesn't take much for something to slip through.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tnull
tnull merged commit 30ab411 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 16, 2025
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ugh, this formatted a handful of lines that #3741 was about to rewrite.

Isn't that easily solved by first formatting the lines in #3741 too before rebasing?

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Its not hard enough to solve either way, but it does mean CI gets delayed a day (luckily not an issue here) and it does mean invalidating existing ACKs and yet more for reviewers to look at.

@joostjager

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

You'd have preferred more coordination with a large PR ready to land, is that what you'd suggest doing next time?

Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@valentinewallace@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@joostjager@tnull