Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); })(); Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant by wpaulino · Pull Request #3894 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant - #3894

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update
Jul 22, 2025
Merged

Introduce RenegotiatedFundingLocked monitor update variant#3894
TheBlueMatt merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
wpaulino:renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update

Conversation

@wpaulino

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a new ChannelMonitorUpdateStep variant intended to be used whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via the RenegotiatedFunding update reaches its intended confirmation depth and both sides of the channel exchange channel_ready/splice_locked. This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.

This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked going forward, until the monitor receives another RenegotiatedFunding update.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 2nd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 3rd Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 4th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 5th Reminder

Hey @jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch 2 times, most recently from 00e8bb3 to c1ead6aCompareJuly 9, 2025 23:25
@wpaulino
wpaulino requested a review from jkczyzJuly 9, 2025 23:26
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.44118% with 47 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.99%. Comparing base (c48e0a8) to head (22d5428).
Report is 194 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
lightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs14.28%24 Missing ⚠️
lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs65.62%20 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
lightning/src/chain/onchaintx.rs83.33%1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #3894 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.65% 88.99% -0.67% 
==========================================
Files 164 167 +3 Lines 134658 121836 -12822 Branches 134658 121836 -12822 ==========================================
- Hits 120734 108432 -12302 + Misses 11246 10988 -258 + Partials 2678 2416 -262 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing22.71% <30.14%> (?)
tests88.82% <65.44%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from c1ead6a to a6d4b1eCompareJuly 14, 2025 18:33
jkczyz
jkczyz previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that rustfmt/MSRV are failing.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channel.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitaiBot previously approved these changes Jul 16, 2025
@wpaulino
wpaulino dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and jkczyz via 3bdf268July 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from a6d4b1e to 3bdf268CompareJuly 16, 2025 00:31
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 3bdf268 to 6c43f5dCompareJuly 17, 2025 17:35
@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @TheBlueMatt@jkczyz! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

Comment threadlightning/src/chain/channelmonitor.rs
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from 6c43f5d to aa625f0CompareJuly 21, 2025 23:25
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs Outdated
This is a new `ChannelMonitorUpdateStep` variant intended to be used
whenever a new funding transaction that was negotiated and applied via
the `RenegotiatedFunding` update reaches its intended confirmation depth
and both sides of the channel exchange `channel_ready`/`splice_locked`.
This commit primarily focuses on its use for splices, but future work
will expand where needed to support RBFs for a dual funded channel.
This monitor update ensures that the monitor can safely drop all prior
commitment data since it is now considered invalid/unnecessary. Once the
update is applied, only state for the new funding transaction is tracked
going forward, until the monitor receives another `RenegotiatedFunding`
update.
It's only intended to be set during initialization and used to check if
the channel is v1 or v2. We rename it to `first_negotiated_funding_txo`
to better reflect its purpose.
@wpaulino
wpaulinoforce-pushed the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch from aa625f0 to 22d5428CompareJuly 22, 2025 01:35

@TheBlueMattTheBlueMatt left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only real changes since @jkczyz's ACK were monitor update application fixes, which I plan to lean up in a followup by fixing the internal API. Gonna land this to keep things moving but a post-merge second glance if you think its work it would be fine to @jkczyz

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 4e4f128 into lightningdevkit:mainJul 22, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@wpaulino
wpaulino deleted the renegotiated-funding-locked-monitor-update branch July 22, 2025 23:14
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@wpaulino@ldk-reviews-bot@TheBlueMatt@jkczyz