Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); #3882 post-rustfmt cleanups by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #3895 · lightningdevkit/rust-lightning · GitHub
Skip to content

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups - #3895

Merged
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

#3882 post-rustfmt cleanups#3895
TheBlueMatt merged 9 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-06-3882-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @valentinewallace as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@dunxendunxen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks more readable to me! Just the (hopefully) two CI fixes and LGTM.

Comment threadlightning/src/ln/async_signer_tests.rs Outdated
Comment threadlightning/src/ln/functional_test_utils.rs Outdated

@valentinewallacevalentinewallace left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM after CI is fixed

Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `async_signer_tests.rs`.
Having tons of `.node.get_our_nod_id()` spewn across all our tests
doesn't help readability, so here we replace some further cases of
it with local variables in `functional_test_utils.rs`.
Calling a macro within a method expression is somewhat annoying
to read, and due to `rustfmt` expansion, calling a `handle_*`
method with a `get_event_msg` macro as the second argument tends to
be substantially less readable than just breaking the mess out into
its own variable.
In some cases `rustfmt` makes long boolean expressions fairly
difficult to parse. Here we clean up a specific case in
`functional_test_utils.rs` which was recently exposed.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`check_closed_event` in `shutdown_tests.rs`. It breaks out the
`ClosureReason` (the thing that usually is being tested for) from
the remaining parameters, which are fairly straightforward and not
the important points, leaving the rest of `check_closed_event` on
one line.
This also fixes some instances where `rustfmt` refused to format
code entirely.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`send_payment_with_route` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're sending a
payment along a route picked on a previous line is important, but
the specific parameters of the payment are not. Thus, condensing
the calls onto a single line by breaking out some parameters into
variables enables the reader to more easily skim past useless
details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter on its own line. In cases where each method parameter is
actually doing something, this can be fine, but in some cases we
have a few method parameters that are straightforward and shouldn't
be the readers focus, mixed with one or two parameters which are
key.
Here, we clean up a regular instance of this in calls to
`peer_connected` in `priv_short_conf_tests.rs` and
`shutdown_tests.rs`. In these tests, the fact that we're
reconnecting is important, but the specific features in the `Init`
message are not. Thus, condensing the calls onto two lines by
breaking the init message out into a variable enables the reader
to more easily skim past useless details.
`rustfmt` loves to make expressions vertical by putting each method
parameter or `.` subexpression on its own line. In cases where each
method parameter or `.` subexpression is actually doing something,
this can be fine, but in some cases we have a few method parameters
that are straightforward and shouldn't be the readers focus, mixed
with one or two parameters which are key or a few subexpressions
which simply do rote variable indexing or locking.
Here we clean up various `rustfmt` verticality that exposes
unimportant details of tests and test utils, making it easier for
the reader to skim past them by introducing additional variables.
The last few commits made various cleanups to some tests files,
which we re-`rustfmt` here.
@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMattforce-pushed the 2025-06-3882-followups branch from 4725228 to 4aa6d39CompareJune 27, 2025 20:54
@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
CollaboratorAuthor

Ha, sorry about that.

@TheBlueMatt
TheBlueMatt merged commit 61a37b1 into lightningdevkit:mainJun 28, 2025
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@dunxen@valentinewallace