Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Follow-ups for #3979 - #4028

Merged
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups
Aug 26, 2025
Merged

Follow-ups for #3979#4028
jkczyz merged 2 commits into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
jkczyz:2025-08-splice-out-fixups

Conversation

@jkczyz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Addresses outstanding comments from #3979.

When processing a splice_ack, the debug_assert on the range of
our_funding_contribution should account for values that are for both
positive (splice-in) and negative (splice-out).
How fees are paid for in a SpliceContribution depends on whether it is a
SpliceIn or SpliceOut. Include this in its docs for clarification.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Thanks for assigning @tankyleo as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@jkczyz
jkczyz requested a review from tankyleoAugust 25, 2025 22:34

@tankyleotankyleo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks !

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.76%. Comparing base (ce203f2) to head (8213f65).
⚠️ Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4028 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 88.76% 88.76% =======================================
Files 176 176 Lines 127944 127944 Branches 127944 127944 =======================================
+ Hits 113564 113568 +4 + Misses 11808 11799 -9 - Partials 2572 2577 +5 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.69% <ø> (ø)
tests88.59% <ø> (+<0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jkczyz
jkczyz merged commit a18f362 into lightningdevkit:mainAug 26, 2025
25 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@jkczyz@ldk-reviews-bot@tankyleo