Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Drop unused variable - #4035

Merged
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups
Sep 1, 2025
Merged

Drop unused variable#4035
tnull merged 1 commit into
lightningdevkit:mainfrom
TheBlueMatt:2025-08-4019-followups

Conversation

@TheBlueMatt

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.

As pointed out at #4019 (comment)

An earlier version of 92f1961
required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but
it is now unused, so can be dropped.
@ldk-reviews-bot

ldk-reviews-bot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 88.74%. Comparing base (2150f24) to head (5f83e54).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01% 
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2 
FlagCoverage Δ
fuzzing21.92% <ø> (ø)
tests88.57% <ø> (+0.01%)⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔔 1st Reminder

Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review.
Please take a look when you have a chance. If you're unable to review, please let us know so we can find another reviewer.

@tnulltnull left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.

@ldk-reviews-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@tnull
tnull merged commit 26639f1 into lightningdevkit:mainSep 1, 2025
37 of 44 checks passed
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@TheBlueMatt@ldk-reviews-bot@tnull