Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Drop unused variable - #4035
Conversation
An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.
I've assigned @tnull as a reviewer! |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #4035 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.73% 88.74% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 176 176 Lines 128891 128891 Branches 128891 128891 ==========================================
+ Hits 114369 114387 +18 + Misses 11926 11910 -16 + Partials 2596 2594 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Sep 1, 2025
🔔 1st Reminder Hey @tnull! This PR has been waiting for your review. |
tnull
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simple enough, although if/how we should do tracking of channel-related onchain transaction is still an ongoing, but separate discussion.
ldk-reviews-bot
commented
Sep 1, 2025
👋 The first review has been submitted! Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
An earlier version of 92f1961 required tracking the funding txo when we initialize splicing, but it is now unused, so can be dropped.
As pointed out at #4019 (comment)